State Category: Wisconsin

55 Organizations Call for Passage and Fast Implementation of Paid Sick Leave for all Workers as a Critical Part of COVID-19 Response

(Washington, DC) – A cross-sector group of 55 public health, health, labor, business and social policy organizations are jointly calling on the Trump Administration and Congress to pass and quickly implement a federal paid sick leave law that provides 14 days of such leave to all workers, available immediately upon declaration of a public health emergency. Fourteen days aligns with the currently recommended quarantine period for COVID-19. Furthermore, and beyond the COVID-19 response, the coalition recommends that the new law require all employers, regardless of their size, to allow workers to earn up to seven days of paid sick leave for use when they or a family member is ill or for preventative care.

The group is also proposing tax relief or interest free loans to be made available for small businesses that provide sick leave benefits during a public health emergency and that employees be allowed to take leave if schools or places of employment close due to a public health emergency. Furthermore, employees should be allowed to use leave to care for family members and should be protected from job loss or any other forms of reprisal if they comply with public health or medical advice to stay home.

Multiple health studies have found that the absence of paid sick leave has been linked to or has exacerbated infectious disease outbreaks in the past. In dealing with the current novel coronavirus, the experience of other countries indicates that aggressive social distancing measures can help slow the spread of the virus. Yet for the 34 million individuals who do not have access to paid sick leave, staying at home may not be a realistic option. Many individuals without paid sick time earn low wages, and a disproportionate percentage work in the service industry. Just 30 percent of low-wage workers in the private sector have access to paid sick leave, compared to 93 percent of higher-wage workers.

“Everyone has a role to play in managing the COVID-19 outbreak. Immediate passage and fast implementation of a national paid sick leave law will allow all workers to follow the directions of their communities’ public health officials. It is critical to mitigation efforts that people be able to stay home from work if they are sick or if they may have been exposed to the virus without facing the impossible choice of their health or their financial stability,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health.

A letter outlining the recommended policy actions was delivered today to Vice President Mike Pence, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, (R-KY), Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, (D-NY), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, (D-CA), and House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).

Organizations signing-on to the letter were:

American Lung Association
American Medical Student Association
American Public Health Association
American School Health Association
American Sexual Health Association
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Antibiotic Resistance Action Center, George Washington University
Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum
Association for Prevention Teaching and Research
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology
Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs
Association of Public Health Laboratories
Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health
Center for Global Health Science and Security Georgetown University
Center for Public Policy Priorities
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Children’s Environmental Health Network
Clean Habitat Inc
Colorado Association of Local Public Health Officials
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists
de Beaumont Foundation
Florida Institute for Health Innovation
Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science and Security
Green & Healthy Homes Initiative
Health Resources in Action
HIV Medicine Association
Immunize Nevada
Infectious Diseases Society of America
Liver Health Initiative
March of Dimes
National Association of County and City Health Officials
National Association of School Nurses
National Coalition of STD Directors
National Council of Jewish Women
National Fragile X Foundation
National Health Care for the Homeless Council
National Network of Public Health Institutes
National Organization for Women
NERDS RULE INC
NW Unangax Culture
NYU School of Global Public Health
PATH
Peggy Lillis Foundation
People’s Action
Prevention Institute
Public Health Institute
Public Health Solutions
Rollins School of Public Health
Safe States Alliance
Shriver Center on Poverty Law
Society for Public Health Education
Sumner M Redstone Global Center for Prevention and Wellness
Trust for America’s Health
Washington State Department of Health
Washington State Public Health Association
Women’s Law Project

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority.  Twitter: @healthyamerica1

TFAH Statement on COVID-19 Preparations

March 3, 2020

Now that the U.S. has transitioned from the planning phase to the response phase of the COVID-19 outbreak, the Federal Executive Branch and Congress as well as state and local governments and other stakeholders should prioritize the following:


Emergency funding is critical now, with ongoing funding to prevent future emergencies

Congress should quickly approve a supplemental funding package, with significant investments in domestic and global public health, healthcare preparedness and research and development of medical countermeasures. Federal agencies should be preparing to quickly distribute funds to states and local governments, as any delay could cost lives.

Congress and the administration should not rely on transfers between health programs to solve this problem.  TFAH recommends that Congress use the supplemental funding package currently being considered to back-fill programs that have already been cut to transfer funding for the COVID-19 outbreak response. Reprogramming money from other public health initiatives, such as chronic disease prevention, won’t serve the public’s health in the long run.

The emergency supplemental funding should include the following priorities:

  • Domestic public health. States and local jurisdictions have stood up their emergency operations, identifying and investigating cases, isolating and quarantining individuals, screening travelers at airports, ensuring the laboratory capacity to test patients for the virus, coordinating with the health sector to guarantee needed services are available, assessing the needs of those who are most vulnerable because of social, economic or environmental conditions and communicating with the public and healthcare facilities. Attention needs to be paid to those people who seem to be most at risk for serious health complications due to COVID-19 including the elderly and people with underlying health conditions. The breadth of the response is quickly exhausting the funding provided in annual appropriations bills.
  • Healthcare response. Hospitals, health centers and other clinical facilities across the nation are preparing to identify, isolate and care for patients with COVID-19.    They must do so without interrupting the routine and necessary clinical services for those with other healthcare needs.  This will require training for healthcare workers on the identification of COVID-19 cases, and on appropriate infection control practices and treatment.  The health care sector needs resources for some of these activities and to ensure it has appropriate personal protective equipment, necessary clinical supplies and equipment, and surge capacity.
  • Medical countermeasures research and development. The U.S. government should prioritize development and procurement of COVID-19 diagnostics, vaccines, and treatments. This will require special measures to anticipate and plan to meet future need and to determine how to make appropriate services available to all with special attention to those in underserved communities.
  • Global health security. The U.S. must support global efforts through the World Health Organization, USAID and other agencies to boost the capacity of lower-income countries to detect and control infectious disease outbreaks.  This will protect Americans as well as other countries by decreasing the likelihood of transmission as a result of travel and commerce.
  • Invest in standing reserve funds. The supplemental should fully replace funds spent from the Infectious Disease Rapid Response Reserve Fund and add a significant amount of money in this fund, so new funding can be immediately accessed if needed to fight COVID-19 and as an investment in protecting Americans from future outbreaks.

The full cost of the outbreak will become clear in the next few months, but in the short term, a significant investment is needed now. Ongoing monitoring of the course of the outbreak will determine the total amount of additional funding that may be required.


Ensure that core public health is continually funded 

In addition to short-term supplemental funding, Congress must prioritize ongoing investment in public health as part of the annual appropriations process.  The nation’s ability to respond to COVID-19 is rooted in our level of public health investment of the last decade.  That is, being prepared starts well before the health emergency is upon us and is grounded in year-in and year-out investment in public health programs. In addition, our public health system needs a highly skilled workforce, state-of-the-art data and information systems and the policies, and plans and resources necessary to meet the routine and unexpected threats to the health and well-being of the American public.  The nation has been caught in a cycle of attention when an outbreak or emergency occurs, followed by complacency and disinvestment in public health preparedness, infrastructure and workforce between emergencies.  These are systems that cannot be established overnight, once an outbreak is underway.

Science is key to effective response

Science needs to govern the nation’s COVID-19 response, led by federal public health experts – including the CDC and NIH leadership – who have years of experience in responding to infectious disease outbreaks.  Keeping the public fully informed is critically important, if trust is to be retained. Policy decisions – from the federal to the local level – should also be based on the best available science.

Local governments and other sectors must prepare now for various contingencies.

  • Healthcare facilities must plan for a surge of patients. Such planning should include taking steps to ensure continuity of operations if a sizable number of their workforce is sick.  They must prioritize the safety of patients and workers, by using personal protective equipment and by providing adequate training. Healthcare coalitions – in coordination with governmental entities – should offer situational awareness and coordination between facilities.
  • Employers, including those in the healthcare sector, should adopt paid sick days protections for workers to protect the health and safety of other workers and the general public. In addition, they should assure their employees that missing work due to illness will not jeopardize their job.
  • Communities that are considering school or business closures or similar measures should consider unintended consequences and take appropriate action steps. If closings are necessary authorities should assist families for whom such action is especially problematic, such as low- income families and individuals without paid sick leave, and children who rely on school meals for adequate nutrition.  Homebound individuals who need access to health care personnel, equipment and medications may also need additional assistance.

The full extent of the outbreak in terms of public health, healthcare and personal costs remains to be seen.  We do know that taking immediate steps to mitigate the effects of the outbreak will save lives and prevent harm.

Nuevo Informe Coloca A 25 Estados Y Distrito De Columbia En Un Nivel De Alto Rendimiento (10) en Medidas De Salud Pública Para Preparación De Emergencias

A medida que aumentan las amenazas, la evaluación anual determina que el nivel de preparación de los estados para emergencias sanitarias está mejorando en algunas áreas, pero está estancado en otras

(Washington, DC) – Veinticinco Estados y el Distrito de Columbia tuvieron un alto desempeño en una medida de tres niveles de preparación de los Estados para proteger la salud public durante una emergencia, según un nuevo informe publicado hoy por Trust for America’s Health (TFAH, por su sigla en inglés).  El informe anual, Ready or Not 2020: Proteging the Public’s Health from Diseases, Disasters and Bioterrorism, encontró una mejora año tras año entre las 10 medidas de preparación para emergencias, pero también señala áreas que necesitan mejoras. El año pasado, 17 Estados se clasificaron en el nivel superior del informe.

Para 2020, 12 Estados se ubicaron en el nivel de rendimiento medio, por debajo de 20 Estados y el Distrito de Columbia en el nivel medio el año pasado, y 13 se ubicaron en el nivel de rendimiento bajo, el mismo número que el año pasado.

El informe encontró que el nivel de preparación de los estados ha mejorado en áreas claves, que incluyen fondos de salud pública, participación en coaliciones y pactos de atención médica, seguridad hospitalaria y vacunación contra la gripe. Sin embargo, otras medidas clave de seguridad de la salud, que incluyen garantizar un suministro de agua seguro y acceso a tiempo libre remunerado, está estancado o perdido.

Nivel de Rendimiento Estados Numero de Estados
Alto AL, CO, CT, DC, DE, IA, ID, IL, KS, MA, MD, ME, MO, MS, NC, NE, NJ,
NM, OK, PA, TN, UT, VA, VT, WA, W		 25 Estados y DC
Medio AZ, CA, FL, GA, KY, LA, MI, MN, ND, OR, RI, TX 12 Estados

Bajo		 AK, AR, HI, IN, MT, NH, NV, NY, OH, SC, SD, WV, WY 13 Estados

 

El informe mide el desempeño anualmente de los Estados utilizando 10 indicadores que, en conjunto, proporcionan una lista de verificación del nivel de preparación de una jurisdicción para prevenir y responder a las amenazas a la salud de sus residentes durante una emergencia. Los indicadores son:

Indicadores de Preparación
1 Gestión de incidentes: adopción del Pacto de licencia de enfermería 6 Seguridad del agua: Porcentaje de la población que utilizó un sistema de agua comunitario que no cumplió con todos los estándares de salud aplicables.
2 Colaboración comunitaria intersectorial: porcentaje de hospitales que participan en coaliciones de atención médica. 7 Resistencia laboral y control de infecciones: porcentaje de población ocupada con tiempo libre remunerado.
3 Calidad institucional: acreditación de la Junta de Acreditación de Salud Pública 8 Utilización de contramedidas: porcentaje de personas de 6 meses o más que recibieron una vacuna contra la gripe estacional.
4 Calidad institucional: acreditación del Programa de acreditación de gestión de emergencias. 9 Seguridad del paciente: porcentaje de hospitales con una clasificación de alta calidad (grado “A”) en el grado de seguridad del hospital Leapfrog.
5 Calidad institucional: tamaño del presupuesto estatal de salud pública, en comparación con el año pasado. 10 Vigilancia de la seguridad de la salud: el laboratorio de salud pública tiene un plan para un aumento de la capacidad de prueba de seis a ocho semanas.

Cuatro Estados (Delaware, Pensilvania, Tennessee y Utah) pasaron del nivel de bajo rendimiento en el informe del año pasado al nivel alto en el informe de este año. Seis Estados (Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Nuevo México, Oklahoma, Vermont) y el Distrito de Columbia pasaron del nivel medio al nivel alto. Ningún Estado cayó del nivel alto al bajo, pero seis pasaron del nivel medio al bajo: Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Carolina del Sur y Virginia Occidental.

“El creciente número de amenazas para la salud de los estadounidenses en 2019, desde inundaciones hasta incendios forestales y vapeo, demuestra la importancia crítica de un sistema de salud pública sólido. Estar preparado es a menudo la diferencia entre daños o no daños durante emergencias de salud y requiere cuatro cosas: planificación, financiamiento dedicado, cooperación interinstitucional y jurisdiccional, y una fuerza laboral calificada de salud pública “, dijo John Auerbach, presidente y CEO de Trust for America’s Health.

“Si bien el informe de este año muestra que, como nación, estamos más preparados para enfrentar emergencias de salud pública, todavía no estamos tan preparados como deberíamos estar”. Se necesita más planificación e inversión para salvar vidas”, dijo Auerbach.

El análisis de TFAH encontró que:

  • La mayoría de los Estados tienen planes para expandir la capacidad de atención médica en una emergencia a través de programas como el Pacto de Licencias de Enfermería u otras coaliciones de atención médica. Treinta y dos Estados participaron en el Pacto de Licencias de Enfermeras, que permite a las enfermeras licenciadas practicar en múltiples jurisdicciones durante una emergencia. Además, el 89 por ciento de los hospitales a nivel nacional participaron en una coalición de atención médica, y 17 estados y el Distrito de Columbia tienen participación universal, lo que significa que todos los hospitales del estado (+ DC) participaron en una coalición. Además, 48 ​​Estados y DC tenían un plan para aumentar la capacidad del laboratorio de salud pública durante una emergencia.
  • La mayoría de los Estados están acreditados en las áreas de salud pública, manejo de emergencias o ambos. Dicha acreditación ayuda a garantizar que los sistemas necesarios de prevención y respuesta ante emergencias estén implementados y que cuenten con personal calificado.
  • La mayoría de las personas que tienen agua de su hogar a través de un sistema de agua comunitario tenían acceso a agua segura. Según los datos de 2018, en promedio, solo el 7 por ciento de los residentes estatales obtuvieron el agua de su hogar de un sistema de agua comunitario que no cumplía con los estándares de salud aplicables, un poco más del 6 por ciento en 2017.
  • Las tasas de vacunación contra la gripe estacional mejoraron, pero aún son demasiado bajas. La tasa de vacunación contra la gripe estacional entre los estadounidenses de 6 meses en adelante aumentó del 42 por ciento durante la temporada de gripe 2017-2018 al 49 por ciento durante la temporada 2018-2019, pero las tasas de vacunación todavía están muy por debajo del objetivo del 70 por ciento establecido por Healthy People 2020.
  • En 2019, solo el 55 por ciento de las personas empleadas tenían acceso a tiempo libre remunerado, el mismo porcentaje que en 2018. Se ha demostrado que la ausencia de tiempo libre remunerado exacerba algunos brotes de enfermedades infecciosas. También puede evitar que las personas reciban atención preventiva.
  • Solo el 30 por ciento de los hospitales, en promedio, obtuvieron las mejores calificaciones de seguridad del paciente, un poco más que el 28 por ciento en 2018. Los puntajes de seguridad hospitalaria miden el desempeño en temas tales como las tasas de infección asociadas a la atención médica, la capacidad de cuidados intensivos y una cultura general de prevención de errores. Dichas medidas son críticas para la seguridad del paciente durante los brotes de enfermedades infecciosas y también son una medida de la capacidad del hospital para funcionar bien durante una emergencia.

Otras secciones del informe describen cómo el sistema de salud pública fue fundamental para la respuesta a la crisis de vapeo, cómo las inequidades en salud ponen a algunas comunidades en mayor riesgo durante una emergencia y las necesidades de las personas con discapacidad durante una emergencia.

Se puede acceder al informe completo en Ready or Not 2020 report.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health es una organización sin fines de lucro y no partidista que promueve la salud óptima para cada persona y comunidad y hace de la prevención de enfermedades y lesiones una prioridad nacional. www.tfah.org. Twitter: @ healthyamerica1

New Report Places 25 States and DC in High Performance Tier on 10 Public Health Emergency Preparedness Measures

As Threats Increase, Annual Assessment Finds States’ Level of Readiness for Health Emergencies is Improving in Some Areas but Stalled in Others

February 5, 2020

(Washington, DC) – Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia were high-performers on a three-tier measure of states’ preparedness to protect the public’s health during an  emergency, according to a new report released today by Trust for America’s Health (TFAH). The annual report, Ready or Not 2020: Protecting the Public’s Health from Diseases, Disasters, and Bioterrorism, found year-over-year improvement among 10 emergency readiness measures, but also notes areas in need of improvement. Last year, 17 states ranked in the report’s top tier.

For 2020, 12 states placed in the middle performance tier, down from 20 states and the District of Columbia in the middle tier last year, and 13 placed in the low performance tier, the same number as last year.

The report found that states’ level of preparedness has improved in key areas, including public health funding, participation in healthcare coalitions and compacts, hospital safety, and seasonal flu vaccination. However, other key health security measures, including ensuring a safe water supply and access to paid time off, stalled or lost ground.

Performance Tier States Number of States
High Tier AL, CO, CT, DC, DE, IA, ID, IL, KS, MA, MD, ME, MO,
MS, NC, NE, NJ, NM, OK, PA, TN, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI		 25 states and DC
Middle Tier AZ, CA, FL, GA, KY, LA, MI, MN, ND, OR, RI, TX 12 states
Low Tier AK, AR, HI, IN, MT, NH, NV, NY, OH, SC, SD, WV, WY 13 states

 

The report measures states’ performance on an annual basis using 10 indicators that, taken together, provide a checklist of a jurisdiction’s level of preparedness to prevent and respond to threats to its residents’ health during an emergency. The indicators are:

Preparedness Indicators 
1 Incident Management: Adoption of the Nurse Licensure Compact. 6 Water Security: Percentage of the population who used a community water system that failed to meet all applicable health-based standards.
2 Cross-Sector Community collaboration: Percentage of hospitals participating in healthcare coalitions. 7 Workforce Resiliency and Infection Control: Percentage of employed population with paid time off.
3 Institutional Quality: Accreditation by the Public Health Accreditation Board. 8 Countermeasure Utilization: Percentage of people ages 6 months or older who received a seasonal flu vaccination.
4 Institutional Quality: Accreditation by the Emergency Management Accreditation Program. 9 Patient Safety: Percentage of hospitals with a top-quality ranking (“A” grade) on the Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade.
5 Institutional Quality: Size of the state public health budget, compared with the past year. 10 Health Security Surveillance: The public health laboratory has a plan for a six-to eight-week surge in testing capacity.

Four states (Delaware, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah) moved from the low performance tier in last year’s report to the high tier in this year’s report. Six states (Illinois, Iowa, Maine, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Vermont) and the District of Columbia moved up from the middle tier to the high tier. No state fell from the high to the low tier but six moved from the middle to the low tier. Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and West Virginia.

“The increasing number of threats to Americans’ health in 2019, from floods to wildfires to vaping, demonstrate the critical importance of a robust public health system. Being prepared is often the difference between harm or no harm during health emergencies and requires four things: planning, dedicated funding, interagency and jurisdictional cooperation, and a skilled public health workforce,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health.

“While this year’s report shows that, as a nation, we are more prepared to deal with public health emergencies, we’re still not as prepared as we should be. More planning and investment are necessary to saves lives,” Auerbach said.

TFAH’s analysis found that:

  • A majority of states have plans in place to expand healthcare capacity in an emergency through programs such as the Nurse Licensure Compact or other healthcare coalitions. Thirty-two states participated in the Nurse Licensure Compact, which allows licensed nurses to practice in multiple jurisdictions during an emergency. Furthermore, 89 percent of hospitals nationally participated in a healthcare coalition, and 17 states and the District of Columbia have universal participation meaning every hospital in the state (+DC)  participated in a coalition. In addition, 48 states and DC had a plan to surge public health laboratory capacity during an emergency.
  • Most states are accredited in the areas of public health, emergency management, or both. Such accreditation helps ensure that necessary emergency prevention and response systems are in place and staffed by qualified personnel.
  • Most people who got their household water through a community water system had access to safe water. Based on 2018 data, on average, just 7 percent of state residents got their household water from a community water system that did not meet applicable health standards, up slightly from 6 percent in 2017.
  • Seasonal flu vaccination rates improved but are still too low. The seasonal flu vaccination rate among Americans ages 6 months and older rose from 42 percent during the 2017-2018 flu season to 49 percent during the 2018-2019 season, but vaccination rates are still well below the 70 percent target established by Healthy People 2020.
  • In 2019, only 55 percent of employed people had access to paid time off, the same percentage as in 2018. The absence of paid time off has been shown to exacerbate some infectious disease outbreaks . It can also prevent people from getting preventive care.
  • Only 30 percent of hospitals, on average, earned top patient safety grades, up slightly from 28 percent in 2018. Hospital safety scores measure performance on such issues as healthcare associated infection rates, intensive-care capacity and an overall culture of error prevention. Such measures are critical to patient safety during infectious disease outbreaks and are also a measure of a hospital’s ability to perform well during an emergency.

The report includes recommended policy actions that the federal government, states and the healthcare sector  should take to improve the nation’s ability to protect the public’s health during emergencies.

Other sections of the report describe how the public health system was critical to the vaping crisis response, how health inequities put some communities at greater risk during an emergency, and the needs of people with disabilities during an emergency.

Read the full text report

New National Data Present a Mixed Picture: Some Drug Overdoses Down but Others are Up, and Suicides Rates are Increasing

(Washington, DC – January 30, 2020) Newly released mortality data from 2018 show the first increase in Americans’ life expectancy since 2014, and the first decline in the rate of drug overdose deaths, including opioid overdoses, since 2012. The year also saw an increase in suicide and in overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids, cocaine, and psychostimulants (a category that includes drugs like methamphetamine, amphetamine, and methylphenidate). The topline trends on mortality and opioids—released by the National Center for Health Statistics on January 30—are heartening after years of alarming trends, but suicides continue to rise, and drug overdoses remain a major public health issue that requires vigilance from policymakers to ensure sustained gains.

Key findings from today’s reports:

  • Life expectancy: American’s life expectancy was 78.7 years in 2018, compared with 78.6 years in 2017. Life expectancy in the United States peaked in 2014 at 78.9 years.
  • Suicide deaths: 48,344 Americans died from suicide in 2018, a rate of 14.2 deaths per 100,000. That’s a rate 2 percent higher than 2017 when 47,173 Americans died from suicide (14.0 deaths per 100,000).
  • Overall drug overdoses deaths: 67,367 Americans died from drug overdoses in 2018, a rate of 20.7 deaths per 100,000. This is a rate 5 percent lower than over 2017 when 70,237 Americans died of drug overdoses (21.7 deaths per 100,000). Even with the decline, the 2018 rate of drug overdoses is still 74 percent higher than 2008.
  • Opioid overdose deaths: 46,802 Americans died from opioid overdoses in 2018, a rate of 14.6 deaths per 100,000. That’s a rate 2 percent lower than 2017 when 47,600 Americans died of opioid overdoses (14.9 deaths per 100,000). Even with the decline, the rate of opioid overdose deaths has more than doubled in the last decade.
  • Synthetic opioid overdose deaths: 31,335 Americans died from synthetic opioid overdoses in 2018, a rate of 9.9 deaths per 100,000. That’s a rate 10 percent higher than 2017 when 28,466 Americans died of synthetic opioids overdoses (9.0 deaths per 100,000). The rate of synthetic opioid overdose deaths has increased almost 900 percent over the last five years.
  • Cocaine overdose deaths: 14,666 Americans died from cocaine overdoses in 2018, a rate of 4.5 deaths per 100,000. That rate is 5 percent higher than 2017, when 13,942 Americans died of cocaine overdoses (4.3 deaths per 100,000). The rate of cocaine overdose deaths has increased by almost three-fold over the past five years.
  • Psychostimulant overdose deaths: 12,676 Americans died from psychostimulants in 2018, a rate of 3.9 deaths per 100,000. That’s a rate 22 percent higher than 2017, when 10,333 Americans died from psychostimulant overdoses (3.2 deaths per 100,000). The rate of psychostimulants overdose death has increased by more than three-fold over the past five years.Additional annual data (1999-2018) and state-level data on drug overdose death can be found below.“While we have some cause for celebration, now is not the time to become complacent,” said Benjamin F. Miller, PsyD, chief strategy officer, Well Being Trust. “It’s been important to focus on harm reduction and saving lives—but policy and investments must go further to reduce what’s driving despair and prevent substance misuse issues and suicidal ideation from developing in the first place. No one policy will solve this crisis we’re facing as a country—what is need is a comprehensive, actionable framework for policy makers.”“These new data suggest efforts to reduce opioid deaths are starting to take hold, particularly by reducing inappropriate opioid prescribing and expanding treatment options,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of the Trust for America’s Health. “These data show we can make a positive difference when we adopt evidence-based approaches and expand the available resources.   But we need to expand that approach to prevent suicides and address all forms of substance misuse.  That requires a comprehensive approach that pays attention to the upstream root causes, like childhood trauma, poverty and discrimination,”Over the last four years, Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) and Well Being Trust (WBT) have released as series of reports on “deaths of despair” called Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol and Suicides Epidemics and the Need for a National Resilience Strategy, which include data analysis and recommendations for evidence-based policies and programs that federal, state, and local officials.

 

Drug Overdose Deaths, 1999-2018 (Rates age-adjusted)

Year Deaths Deaths per 100,000
1999 16,849 6.1
2000 17,415 6.2
2001 19,394 6.8
2002 23,518 8.2
2003 25,785 8.9
2004 27,424 9.4
2005 29,813 10.1
2006 34,425 11.5
2007 36,010 11.9
2008 36,450 11.9
2009 37,004 11.9
2010 38,329 12.3
2011 41,340 13.2
2012 41,502 13.1
2013 43,982 13.8
2014 47,055 14.7
2015 52,404 16.3
2016 63,632 19.8
2017 70,237 21.7
2018 67,367 20.7

Source National Vital Statistics System, National Center for Health Statistics

 

2018 Drug Overdose Deaths by State

State Deaths Deaths per 100,000
Alabama 775 16.6
Alaska 110 14.6
Arizona 1670 23.8
Arkansas 444 15.7
California 5348 12.8
Colorado 995 16.8
Connecticut 1069 30.7
Delaware 401 43.8
DC 254 35.4
Florida 4698 22.8
Georgia 1404 13.2
Hawaii 213 14.3
Idaho 250 14.6
Illinois 2722 21.3
Indiana 1629 25.6
Iowa 287 9.6
Kansas 345 12.4
Kentucky 1315 30.9
Louisiana 1140 25.4
Maine 345 27.9
Maryland 2324 37.2
Massachusetts 2241 32.8
Michigan 2591 26.6
Minnesota 636 11.5
Mississippi 310 10.8
Missouri 1610 27.5
Montana 125 12.2
Nebraska 138 7.4
Nevada 688 21.2
New Hampshire 452 35.8
New Jersey 2900 33.1
New Mexico 537 26.7
New York 3697 18.4
North Carolina 2259 22.4
North Dakota 70 10.2
Ohio 3980 35.9
Oklahoma 716 18.4
Oregon 547 12.6
Pennsylvania 4415 36.1
Rhode Island 317 30.1
South Carolina 1125 22.6
South Dakota 57 6.9
Tennessee 1823 27.5
Texas 3005 10.4
Utah 624 21.2
Vermont 153 26.6
Virginia 1448 17.1
Washington 1164 14.8
West Virginia 856 51.5
Wisconsin 1079 19.2
Wyoming 66 11.1

Source National Vital Statistics System, National Center for Health Statistics

 # # #

 Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. @HealthyAmerica1

Well Being Trust is a national foundation dedicated to advancing the mental, social, and spiritual health of the nation. Created to include participation from organizations across sectors and perspectives, Well Being Trust is committed to innovating and addressing the most critical mental health challenges facing America, and to transforming individual and community well-being. www.wellbeingtrust.org @WellBeingTrust

New Maps Track Laws Related to Tobacco Pricing Strategies and Syringe Service Programs in US

(Philadelphia, Pa – Novermber 19, 2019)  Two new maps published to LawAtlas.org today — syringe service programs (SSPs) and tobacco pricing strategies — offer a comprehensive look at US laws that address tobacco pricing strategies and access to clean syringes through syringe service programs.

“States have a vital role to play in promoting the health and well-being of their residents. These datasets, along with other resources produced under the Promoting Health and Cost Control (PHACCS) in States initiative, will provide decisionmakers, advocates, and other key stakeholders with the evidence and business case for the adoption of policies that have been shown to improve community health,” said Adam Lustig, MS, Manager and Co-Principal Investigator of the PHACCS initiative.

The maps are the first two legal data resources in a new series created and maintained by the Center for Public Health Law Research at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law (CPHLR)  with the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH).

Researchers from the Center used the scientific policy surveillance process in collaboration with experts from TFAH to provide states with detailed information about the current state of US laws that could be used to improve community health through cost-saving policy changes.

“You must first measure a policy to understand its impact on health and cost. These maps give policymakers, advocates, practitioners and other stakeholders a comprehensive look into what these laws say and how the nuanced characteristics differ across the US,” said Lindsay Cloud, JD, Director of the Policy Surveillance Program at CPHLR. “The policy surveillance process we use is the gold standard for legal research because it creates objective, detailed legal data that can be used for evaluation and provides a clear visual to identifying gaps and areas for policy improvement.”

The project will include 13 datasets on a variety of public health topics through the end of 2020, ranging from universal pre-kindergarten and school nutrition standards, to housing and economic policies like the Earned Income Tax Credit and paid sick and family leave laws. The laws displayed were in effect as of August 1, 2019.

The two datasets released today, on syringe service programs and tobacco pricing strategies, represent two of the harm reduction-focused datasets in the series.


Syringe Service Programs

Syringe service program (SSP) policies authorize the legal sale and exchange of sterile syringes, and are one of the most effective and scientifically-based methods for reducing the spread of HIV and Hepatitis. This legal map identifies where SSPs have been explicitly authorized by the law, legal exemptions for individuals who access SSPs if they’re in possession of paraphernalia if stopped by law enforcement, and additional services an SSP must provide directly or through referrals.

Some key findings from this dataset include:

  • 31 states have passed laws that explicitly authorize SSPs. This number has nearly doubled since 2014 (18 states as of August 1, 2014).
  • In four of the 31 states – Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, and Maine – the law requires a one-for-one exchange of syringes.
  • In three states – Colorado, Georgia and Ohio – SSPs are also required to provide HIV and Hepatitis screenings.


Tobacco Pricing Strategies

Tobacco use and exposure to second-hand smoke are leading causes of preventable death in the US. One strategy to decrease tobacco use and promote quitting is to increase the price of tobacco products. This legal map details US laws that apply taxes or set pricing limits for tobacco products, like traditional cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and others.

Some key findings from this dataset include:

  • All 50 states and the District of Columbia tax cigarettes.
  • All 50 states and the District of Columbia have taxes on non-cigarette tobacco products.
  • 14 states and the District of Columbia also tax e-cigarettes, either by taxing the device, the liquid, or both.
  • 31 states and the District of Columbia prohibit selling cigarettes, non-cigarette tobacco products, or both below cost.
  • 32 states preempt local taxation of tobacco, either through explicit prohibitions on local tobacco taxation or through general limitations on the power of local governments to impose their own excise taxes.

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. Learn more at www.tfah.org

The Center for Public Health Law Research at the Temple University Beasley School of Law supports the widespread adoption of scientific tools and methods for mapping and evaluating the impact of law on health. Learn more at http://phlr.org

 

 

The State of Obesity 2019 Congressional Briefing: Better Policies for a Healthier America

On November 18th, 2019, Trust for America’s Health held a briefing for congressional staff and partners that reviewed the latest obesity rates and trends, the role of public health and other stakeholders in preventing, treating and responding to obesity and its comorbidities, highlighted promising approaches to ensure healthy communities, and offered evidence-based policy recommendations that could help all Americans lead healthier lives.

Briefing speakers included:

  • John Auerbach, MBA, President and CEO, Trust for America’s Health
  • Devita Davison, Executive Director, FoodLab Detroit
  • Martha Halko, MS, RD, LD, Deputy Director of Prevention & Wellness, Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Board of Health
  • Ruth Petersen, MD, MPH, Director, Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC)

Briefing materials:

  • Panelists biographies
  • Presentation slides
  • CDC Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity At A Glance fact sheet
  • CDC Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity’s Work in Healthcare Settings to Reduce Childhood Obesity fact sheet
  • TFAH’s State of Obesity 2019 Report
  • TFAH’s State of Obesity 2019 report fact sheet
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s (RWJF) 2019 Obesity Report

For more information, please contact Daphne Delgado, TFAH Senior Government Relations Manager at [email protected]

 

Adolescent Suicide Up 87 Percent Over Last Decade; LGBT and American Indian/Alaskan Native Teens at Highest Risk

Vaping among teens also increasing at an alarming rate.

(Washington, DC and Oakland, CA – October 29, 2019) – Adolescent suicides have spiked over the last decade and substance misuse including vaping is exacting a heavy toll on teens according to a report released today by Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) and Well Being Trust (WBT).

The report, Addressing a Crisis: Cross-Sector Strategies to Prevent Adolescent Substance Misuse and Suicide finds that, while progress has been made in reducing some risky behaviors, adolescent suicide and substance misuse rates remain high and in some cases are climbing. The report calls for the expansion of evidence-based and cross-sector strategies in order to save lives.

Suicide rates among 12- to 19-year-olds have increased 87 percent between 2007 and 2017 (when the most recent data is available) – making suicide the second leading cause of death among adolescents. In 2017, 7.4 percent of high schoolers nationwide attempted suicide within the preceding 12 months – a 17 percent increase from the previous year. Nearly 3,000 12- to 19-year-olds died by suicide in 2017.

“We know strategies that are proven to work and can improve mental health and well-being among our young people,” said Benjamin F. Miller, PsyD, chief strategy officer, WBT. “From Zero Suicide to Youth Mental Health First Aid to LifeSkills Training programs and dozens of other initiatives, there are solutions out there – why this is not the first question of every Presidential debate, prioritized in Congress, and in every state legislature is beyond me. Our country has failed to devote the time, energy, and resources to our youth.”

An additional area of concern threatening youth well-being is vaping—with rates of use among adolescents climbing dramatically. In just one year, 2017 to 2018, e-cigarette use by high school students increased by 78 percent and by 48 percent among middle school students. More teens are also reporting vaping marijuana.

While there is some good news – rates of illicit or injection and prescription drug use among adolescents have declined or held steady among 12- to 17-year-olds since 2002 – but those rates are still too high and cause serious harm and disruption to young lives. In 2017, 5,455 young people between the ages of 15 to 24 died due to a drug overdose.

Alcohol use among adolescents has also declined. Past month alcohol use among 12- to 17-year-olds declined from 18 percent in 2002 to 10 percent in 2017 and lifetime alcohol use among high school students has declined from 82 percent in 1991 to 60 percent in 2017.

Substance misuse and suicide disproportionately affect adolescents from certain population groups

Of additional concern are large disparities in substance misuse rates and suicide based on teens’ race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation/gender identification or where they live.  Most striking is the high risk for substance misuse and suicide-related behaviors among gay, lesbian and bisexual adolescents.  Forty-eight percent of gay, lesbian and bisexual adolescents report considering or attempting suicide as compared to 13 percent of their heterosexual peers.  These high rates of suicide risk for sexual minority teens are likely due to stressors they experience including discrimination, bullying, violence and family rejection, according to the report.

American Indian/Alaskan Native teens experience the highest rates of suicide among any race and ethnicity in the United States: 16 suicides per 100,000 15- to 19-years-olds in 2016 – a rate 60 percent higher than the national average for all teens.  The high rates of substance misuse and suicide among American Indian/Alaskan Native teens are likely associated with the historical and intergenerational trauma experienced by their community as well as the lack of education and economic opportunities typically available to them.

Solutions do exist and need implementation

Adolescence is a critical juncture in teens’ lives. This report highlights the many opportunities to set youth on healthy pathways be increasing the life circumstances that protect them from harm.

The report highlights dozens of evidence-based programs in place in communities across the country that help reduce risk and build protective factors in teens’ lives  by strengthening families, providing counseling and mentorship, teaching social and emotional skills, fostering connectedness, particularly in schools, and working across sectors. Most importantly, addressing the factors that create or reduce risk for substance misuse or mental health issues will not only reduce negative impact on teens’ health, it will also improve outcomes in other sectors such as high school graduation rates or involvement with the juvenile justice system.

“Adolescence is a challenging time when the impact of poverty, discrimination, bullying and isolation can be intense,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. ” Fortunately, there are policies and programs that can reduce some of these circumstances and the risks associated with them by strengthening teens’ coping and emotional skills – skills that can improve their health and lead to their succeeding in school.”

Recommendations for programs and policy actions

The report includes recommendations for policy actions at the federal, state and local level.

Among the specific recommendations are:

  • The federal government and state legislatures should create and/or scale up policies that support families including increases to federal and state earned income tax credits and programs that provide access to health insurance and affordable housing.
  • Congress should increase funding for substance misuse and suicide prevention including Project AWARE and the Garrett Lee Smith State/Tribal Youth Suicide Prevention and Early Intervention Grant program.
  • States should expand Medicaid services in schools using flexible models such as school-employed providers, school-based health centers and telehealth.
  • Congress should increase investments in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of Adolescent and School Health.
  • All youth-serving systems should adopt trauma-informed and culturally competent policies and practices and should engage youth leaders in program development.
  • Federal, state and local efforts to improve school safety should include strategies to prevent school violence by investing in safe and supportive school environments and mental health services.
  • Public and private funders should incentivize strategies that address common risk/protective factors across all adolescent serving sectors.

The report is part of the TFAH/WBT Pain in the Nation publication series, launched in 2017 and examining substance misuse and suicide trends and evidence-based policies and programs in an effort to promote a comprehensive approach to solving the nation’s deaths of despair crisis. The report series is designed to focus attention on the need for national resilience strategy.

 

####

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. Twitter: @healthyamerica1

Well Being Trust is a national foundation dedicated to advancing the mental, social, and spiritual health of the nation. Created to include participation from organizations across sectors and perspectives, Well Being Trust is committed to innovating and addressing the most critical mental health challenges facing America, and to transforming individual and community well-being. www.wellbeingtrust.org. Twitter: @WellBeingTrust.