Public Health Funding Archives - Page 22 of 29

Cultivating Health for Success

Cultivating Health for Success (CHS) established in 2010, focuses on the inclusion of safe, affordable, and supportive housing to reduce unplanned care, improve adherence to recommended treatment, and improve health care cost and outcomes as well as quality of life for participants in greater Pittsburgh. CHS serves adults with one or more chronic illnesses and those with a history of at least one year of above average use of unplanned care, such as crisis services, Emergency Department visits, and the homeless. To deliver services, CHS partners with the Allegheny County Department of Human Services, Metro Family Practice, Community Human Services, UPMC for You, and the Community Care Behavioral Health Organization. Since CHS’s inception, per-member per-month (PMPM) medical costs have decreased 11.5 percent, the average PMPM for unplanned care has decreased by 19.2 percent, and the average prescription PMPM increased by 5.2 percent for participants with a meaningful tenure in the program. CHS is funded by UMPC for You contributions. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].

Corporation for Supportive Housing

The Corporation for Supportive Housing (CSH) provides capital, expertise, information, and innovation to transform how communities use housing solutions to improve lives of vulnerable populations. Founded in 1991 and headquartered in New York City with staff stationed in more than 20 locations throughout the country, CSH’s work focuses on capacity-building, policy and advocacy, supportive housing technical assistance and housing development, and demonstrating pilot initiatives to build evidence. One of CSH’s most effective pilots is the Frequent Users of Health Services Initiative, a six-year, $10 million pilot that sought to deliver innovative, integrated approaches to meet the health, housing, and social service needs of frequent users of emergency departments and inpatient hospitalization. Program results included a 27 percent drop in inpatient hospitalization versus a 26 percent increase for those not connected to housing. In addition, those in supportive housing experienced a 34 percent drop in emergency room visits compared to only a 12 percent drop among those not in supportive housing. In 2011, CSH was awarded $2.3 million over two years by the federal Corporation for National and Community Service and is using these funds to invest in supportive housing models that provide cost-effective solutions for people with complex health needs and facing housing crises. CSH funding comes from a mix of roughly 150 foundations, corporations, public agencies, investment income, and gifts from individual donors. Read the summary brief to learn more about this innovative program.

Register today for the July 10 webinar, Advancing Health Equity During and Beyond COVID-19: Addressing Housing and Homelessness

Community Assessment Project

The Community Assessment Project (CAP) is a broad-based collaborative of the United Way of Santa Cruz County, California that jointly conducts community health needs assessments and publishes an annual countywide community indicators report. The report, first introduced 20 years ago, serves as the community health needs assessment for local nonprofit hospitals and includes indicators in six domains: economy, education, health, public safety, natural environment, and social environment. The CAP also conducts a bi-annual quality-of-life survey of the County’s households. A sampling of the goals in 2015 include: improvement in access to primary care; comprehensive health care coverage for children; and a decrease in the prevalence of childhood obesity. Annually, CAP measures and reports progress toward its goals. For example, in 2007, the Healthy Kids Insurance Program achieved 98 percent insurance coverage for children in Santa Cruz County. CAP is funded by local hospitals, city and county governments, utility companies, colleges, and non-profit organizations. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].

Common Table Health Alliance: Backbone for the Healthy Shelby Partnership

The Common Table Health Alliance is a regional health improvement collaborative and an Aligning Forces for Quality Community. In 2011, the Shelby County Mayor, Memphis City Mayor, and the four major health systems engaged the Common Table Health Alliance as the backbone organization for the Healthy Shelby Partnership, which is one of the key pillars of Memphis Fast Forward, a broad-based collective impact initiative. Healthy Shelby connects social service agencies with the health care system to jointly address the social determinants of health. Common Table Health Alliance has implemented evidence-based and best practices, used social media, employed education programs, coordinated partner engagement, and is tracking 12 measures. Successful programs include a safe sleep campaign and a community hypertension registry. The goal is to improve the health rankings of Memphis and Shelby County. Healthy Shelby has received core funding from the Baptist Memorial Health Care, Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare, Region One Health and Saint Francis Hospital, city and county governments, and grants from the United Way and Medtronic. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].

Come to the Table

ohiSince 2009, ProMedica’s, “Come to the Table” program has been working to ensure the well-being of communities in northwest Ohio and southeast Michigan by creating services and programs addressing basic nutritional needs. The link between hunger and poor health is clear—adults living in food insecure homes have chronic diseases and behavioral health conditions. Food-insecure children suffer an even greater impact with delayed development and poorer quality of life. Health threats resulting from hunger are preventable and ProMedica continues to develop and implement strategies to feed communities including: operating a food reclamation program to repackage un-served food and distribute to homeless shelters; developing a food security screening program to identify hospital patients who are food insecure to ensure they have food and access to resources upon being discharged from the hospital; and the future opening of the Ebeid Institute for Population Health in Toledo, Ohio, which will have a fresh food market and offer job training and health services. ProMedica’s strong community partnerships at the local, state, and federal levels are central to developing these collaborative opportunities. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].

Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center Community and Population Health Initiative

In 2010, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) started the Community and Population Health Initiative to tackle the most prevalent, challenging, and burdensome health issues facing children and families in southern Ohio. By creating partnerships within the community and focusing on the pillars of the Institute for Health Care Improvement’s Triple Aim framework, the Community and Population Health Initiative has reduced the negative impact of social determinants like education, housing, and the environment on health outcomes. To date, CCHMC has seen a reduction in asthma admissions, improved social and environmental risk screening during both inpatient and outpatient care, and substantial increases in connections between families and key resources in the community. The initiative began with funding from CCHMC, as well as funding from federal agencies and foundations. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].

Changing the Narrative About What Creates Health—Essential Steps in Improving Population Health in Minnesota

The goal of Changing the Narrative about What Creates Health— Essential Steps in Improving Population Health is to bring about critical change to effectively address the social determinants of health and achieve health equity. Launched in 2011 by the Minnesota Health Department, this initiative shifts the responsibility for health to a community level to address the conditions in which all people can be healthy through policy, systems, and environmental changes. Key strategies include: the creation of a Healthy Minnesota 2020 framework that engages partners in all sectors; community engagement via the Healthy Minnesota Partnership, establishment of cabinet-level committee on Health in All Policies; a State Health Improvement Program that outlines policy, systems, and environmental changes; and creation of Accountable Communities for Health. By focusing the narrative on what creates health (beyond the health system), community agencies and groups have become involved in health policies contributing to policy changes including: anti-bullying law; minimum wage increase; smoke-free campuses and apartments; and complete street ordinances. Minnesota has also shown decreasing rates of childhood obesity and youth tobacco use, and increasing rates of breastfeeding. This initiative is funded by State Health Department grants. To read more about this innovative program, see this brief summary [link].

Nearly Half of States Score 5 or Lower out of 10 on Substance Misuse Prevention Report Card

Youth Drug Overdose Death Rates more than Doubled in 35 States in Just Over a Decade

Washington, D.C., November 19, 2015– According to a new Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) report, Reducing Teen Substance Misuse: What Really Works, 24 states scored five or lower out of 10 on key indicators of leading evidence-based policies and programs that can improve the well-being of children and youth and have been connected with preventing and reducing substance – alcohol, tobacco or other drugs – misuse.

Four states tied for the lowest score of three out of a possible 10 – Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi and Wyoming – while two states achieved 10 out of 10 – Minnesota and New Jersey. The indicators were developed in consultation with top substance misuse prevention experts.

The Reducing Teen Substance Misuse report includes an analysis of the most recent drug overdose death rates among 12- to 25-year-olds, finding that:

Current rates were highest in West Virginia (12.6 per 100,000 youth) — which were more than five times higher than the lowest rates in North Dakota (2.2 per 100,000).
Males are 2.5 times as likely to overdose as females (10.4 vs. 4.1 per 100,000).
In 1999-2001, no state had a youth drug overdose death rate above 6.1 per 100,000. By 2011-13, 33 states were above 6.1 per 100,000. In the past 12 years:
- Rates have more than doubled in 18 states (Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina and Tennessee);
- Rates have more than tripled in twelve states (Arkansas, Delaware, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, New Hampshire, New York, Oklahoma, Utah and West Virginia); and
- Rates have more than quadrupled in five states (Kansas, Montana, Ohio, Wisconsin and Wyoming).

“More than 90 percent of adults who develop a substance use disorder began using before they were 18,” said Jeffrey Levi, PhD, executive director of TFAH. “Achieving any major reduction in substance misuse will require a reboot in our approach – starting with a greater emphasis on preventing use before it starts, intervening and providing support earlier and viewing treatment and recovery as a long-term commitment.”

The increase in youth drug overdose deaths is largely tied to increases in prescription drug misuse and the related doubling in heroin use by 18- to 25-year-olds in the past 10 years – 45 percent of people who use heroin are also addicted to prescription painkillers.

In addition, youth marijuana rates have increased by nearly 6 percent since 2008 and more than 13 percent of high school students report using e-cigarettes. Youth from affluent families and/or neighborhoods report more frequent substance and alcohol use than lower-income teens – often related to having more resources to access alcohol and drugs.

The report highlights 10 indicators of the types of policy strategies that can help curb substance misuse by tweens, teens and young adults:

Limiting Access:
- 37 states and Washington, D.C. have liability “dram shop” laws holding establishments accountable for selling alcohol to underage or obviously intoxicated individuals.
- 30 states and Washington, D.C. have smoke-free laws prohibiting smoking in public places, including restaurants and bars.

Supporting Improved Well-being of Tweens, Teens and Young Adults:
- 30 states had rates of treatment for teens with major depressive episodes above 38.1 percent.
- 29 states and Washington, D.C. increased funding for mental health services in Fiscal Year 2015.
- 21 states have comprehensive bullying prevention laws.
- 35 states have at least an 80 percent high school graduation rate.
- 31 states and Washington, D.C. have taken action to roll back “one-size-fits-all” sentences for nonviolent drug and other offenses.

Improving Counseling, Early Intervention and Treatment and Recovery Support:
- 32 states and Washington, D.C. have explicit billing codes for Screening (questionnaires/conversations), Brief Intervention (short counseling) and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in their medical health (Medicaid or private insurance) programs, yet currently fewer than half of pediatricians report talking to teen patients about alcohol and other drug use.
- 31 states and Washington, D.C. have laws in place to provide a degree of immunity from criminal charges or mitigation of sentencing for an individual seeking help for themselves or others experiencing an overdose.
- 30 states and Washington, D.C. provide Medicaid coverage for all three medications approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of painkiller addiction.

“The case for a prevention-first and continuum-of-care approach is supported by more than 40 years of research, but the science hasn’t been implemented on a wide scale in the real world,” said Alexa Eggleston, senior program officer, domestic programs, Conrad N. Hilton Foundation. “It’s time to bring innovations to scale and invest in more proactive and sustained approaches that promote positive protective factors, like safe, stable families, homes, schools and communities and intervene early to address youth substance use before addiction develops.”

Reducing Teen Substance Misuse identified a set of research-based approaches and recommendations to modernize the nation’s strategy to prevent and reduce substance use and support a full continuum-of-care, including:

Putting prevention first, using evidence-based approaches across communities and in schools. Each state should have an end-to-end network of experts and resources to support the effective community-based selection, adoption, implementation and evaluation of evidence-based programs;
Strategically investing in evidence-based programs that show the strongest results in reducing risk factors for substance misuse, poor academic performance, bullying, depression, violence, suicide, unsafe sexual behaviors and other problems that often emerge during teen years and young adulthood;
Integrating school-based and wider community efforts, via multisector collaboration – and effectively collecting data to assess community needs, better select programs that match with those needs and improve accountability. Schools cannot and should not be expected to solve the problem on their own;
Renewing efforts to gain support for the adoption and implementation of evidence-based and sustained school-based programs – moving beyond decades of ineffective approaches;
Incorporating SBIRT as a routine practice in middle and high schools and healthcare settings – along with other regular health screenings – even brief counseling and interventions can have a positive impact; and
Increasing funding support for sustained and ongoing mental health and substance use treatment and recovery.

The report provides additional research-based recommendations for preventing and reducing youth substance misuse. It was supported by a grant from the Conrad N. Hilton Foundation.

Score Summary:

A full list of all of the indicators and scores, listed below. For the state-by-state scoring, states received one point for achieving an indicator or zero points if they did not achieve the indicator. Zero is the lowest possible overall score, 10 is the highest.

10 out of 10: Minnesota and New Jersey

9 out of 10: California, Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, New Mexico, New York and Vermont

8 out of 10: Delaware, District of Columbia, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Ohio, Oregon, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin

7 out of 10: Colorado, Iowa, North Carolina and Pennsylvania

6 out of 10: Alabama, Illinois, Missouri, Rhode Island and Utah

5 out of 10: Arkansas, Florida, Hawaii, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota and Oklahoma

4 out of 10: Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Nebraska, Nevada, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and West Virginia

3 out of 10: Idaho, Louisiana, Mississippi and Wyoming

STATE-BY-STATE YOUTH DRUG OVERDOSE DEATH RANKINGS

Note: Rates include drug overdose deaths, for 2011-2013, a three-year average, for 12- to 25-year-olds. 1 = Highest rate of drug overdose fatalities, 50 = lowest rate of drug overdose fatalities. States with statistically significant (p<0.05) increases since 2005-2007 are noted with an asterisk (*), while states with a statistically significant decrease are noted with two asterisks (**).

1. West Virginia (12.6); 2. New Mexico (12.5); 3. Utah (12.1); 4. Pennsylvania (11.8); 5. Nevada (11.6); 6. New Jersey (10.7*); 7. Kentucky (10.5); 8. (tie) Arizona (10.2*) and Colorado (10.2*) and Delaware (10.2*); 11. Wyoming (9.8*); 12. Indiana (9.6); 13. Missouri (9.5*); 14. Oklahoma (9.4); 15. New Hampshire (9.3); 16. Ohio (9.1*); 17. Wisconsin (8.8*); 18. Maryland (8.5); 19. Arkansas (8.4); 20. Connecticut (8.3); 21. Illinois (8.2*); 22. Michigan (8.1*); 23. Massachusetts (7.8); 24. Alaska (7.2); 25. North Carolina (7.1); 26. (tie) Montana (7.0) and Tennessee (7.0**) and Vermont (7.0); 29. (tie) New York (6.9*) and Washington (6.9); 31. Oregon (6.5); 32. (tie) Alabama (6.2) and Louisiana (6.2**); 34. (tie) Rhode Island (6.0) and Texas (6.0); 36. (tie) Kansas (5.9) and Virginia (5.9); 38. (tie) Idaho (5.8) and South Carolina (5.8); 40. (tie) Florida (5.7**) and Minnesota (5.7*); 42. Georgia (5.2); 43. California (4.9*); 44. Maine (4.7**); 45. Hawaii (4.6); 46. Iowa (4.3); 47. (tie) Mississippi (3.7**) and Nebraska (3.7); 49. South Dakota (3.3); 50. North Dakota (2.2).

###

Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority.

Reducing Teen Substance Misuse: What Really Works

New TFAH Report Focuses on Priority Policies for Reducing Toxic Stress and Adverse Childhood Experiences

Washington, D.C., November 3, 2015— A new report, A Healthy Early Childhood Action Plan: Policies for a Lifetime of Well-being, released today by the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), highlights more than 40 policy target areas that are key to achieving national goals of reducing toxic stress and Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and improving the lives of millions of children.

Living with prolonged stress and/or adverse experiences can significantly increase a child’s risk for a range of physical, mental and behavioral problems – increasing the likelihood for hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, cognitive and developmental disorders, depression, anxiety and a range of other concerns.

Currently, around one-quarter of children ages 5 and younger live in poverty and more than half of all children experience at least one ACE. According to research from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), more than one-quarter of children experience physical abuse (28.3 percent) and substance abuse in the household (26.9 percent) while sexual abuse (24.7 percent for girls and 16 percent for boys) and parent divorce or separation (23.3 percent) are also prevalent.

“More and more studies show investing in early childhood pays off in a lifetime of better health and well-being,” said Jeffrey Levi, PhD, executive director of TFAH. “There are dozens of policy levers we can and should be pushing to ensure all children have high-quality preventive healthcare; safe, stable, nurturing relationships, homes and communities; good nutrition and enough physical activity; and positive early learning experiences.”

The report calls for increased public health engagement in early childhood areas, with a series of recommendations including to:

Build beyond the traditional healthcare system by integrating health and other social supports, including accountable health communities for children, by:

Ensuring every child has access to high-quality and affordable healthcare;
Building systems to help identify and provide support for children’s needs beyond the traditional medical system, but that have a major impact on health;
Focusing on a two generation approach to healthcare – and social service support;
Modernizing and expanding the availability of mental health and substance misuse treatment services – for both parents and children;
Expanding the focus of a trauma-informed approach across a wider range of federal, state and locally supported services; and
Improving services and care coordination for Children and Youth with Special Healthcare Needs (CYSHCN).

Promote protective, healthy communities and establish expert and technical assistance backbone support to help spread and scale programs nationally and in every state, by:

Improving the collection, analysis and integration of child health, well-being and services data to better assess trends and target services and programs;
Strengthening the role of federal, state and local health departments as the chief health strategist in communities; and
Establishing a support organization in every state that provides expertise and technical assistance.

Increase investments in core, effective early childhood policies and programs, by:

Making programs and services that promote early childhood well-being a higher priority to ensure they can be delivered on a scale to help all families (ranging from home visiting programs to child welfare services to increasing economic opportunity for families to child care and early education); and
Better aligning systems and financial resources to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of health, social services and education services.

The report includes a series of maps showing the status of different states on key trends and policy areas and case studies of evidence-based and model programs, organizations and initiatives—which are putting these recommendations into action—including the Nurse Family Partnership, Family Check Up Models, Abriendo Puertas/Opening Doors, Good Behavior Game, Child-Parent Center Program, Crittenton Children’s Center at Saint Luke’s Health System, Wholesome Wave, Community Asthma Initiative at Boston Children’s Hospital and many others.

“If we work together across sectors – bringing together the collective energy and resources of diverse partners – we will have a better chance of achieving the common goal of a healthy start for all of America’s children,” said Gail Christopher, chair of TFAH’s Board of Directors and vice president for policy and senior advisor at the WK Kellogg Foundation. “This report shines a light on many promising policies and programs. But the question remains whether we can garner the public will to turn the potential into the promise that improves the lives of our next generation.”

The full report was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

###