Policymakers and Health Systems Must Earn Trust within Communities of Color and Tribal Nations to Ensure COVID-19 Vaccine Receptivity, Say Health and Public Health Leaders

Policy brief calls for building vaccine acceptance in communities of color and tribal communities through data transparency, tailored communications via trusted messengers, ensuring ease of vaccine access and no out-of-pocket costs

(Washington, DC – Dec. 21, 2020) – A woeful history of maltreatment of communities of color and tribal nations by government and the health sector, coupled with present day marginalization of these communities by the healthcare system, are the root of vaccine distrust among those groups, according to a policy brief, Building Trust in and Access to a COVID-19 Vaccine Among People of Color and Tribal Nations released today by Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) and co-authors the National Medical Association (NMA) and UnidosUS.

This historic maltreatment, coupled with current day structural racism, has played out in COVID-19’s disproportionate impact on communities of color and tribal communities. These factors also make ensuring vaccine receptivity and access within those communities challenging and of critical importance to protecting lives and ending the pandemic.

In October 2020, TFAH, NMA and UnidosUS hosted a policy convening with 40 leading health equity, healthcare, civil rights, and public health organizations. The purpose of the convening was to advise policymakers on the barriers to vaccine receptivity within communities of color and tribal communities and how to overcome those barriers.

“Earning trust within communities of color and tribal communities will be critical to the successful administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. Doing so will require prioritizing equity, ensuring that leaders from those communities have authentic opportunities to impact vaccine distribution and administration planning, and, the resources to fully participate in supporting vaccine outreach, education and delivery in their communities,” said Dr. J. Nadine Gracia, Executive Vice President and COO of Trust for America’s Health.

The convening created recommendations for policy actions that should be taken immediately within six key areas:

Ensure the scientific fidelity of the vaccine development process.

  • HHS and vaccine developers should release all available vaccine data at frequent and regular intervals to improve transparency and increase confidence in the vaccine evaluation process. Leadership at FDA and HHS must commit to advancing any vaccine only after it has been validated based on established federal and scientific protocols. Programs to monitor for adverse events must also be in place and transparent. Any perception of bypassing safety measures or withholding information could derail a successful vaccination effort.
  • FDA should engage health and public health professional societies, particularly those representing healthcare providers of color, local public health officials, as well as other stakeholders with a role in vaccination, and allow these groups to validate all available data, review the vaccine development and approval process, and issue regular updates on data to their patients, members, and the public.

 Equip trusted community organizations and networks within communities of color and tribal nations to participate in vaccination planning, education, delivery and administration.  Ensure their meaningful engagement and participation by providing funding.

  • Congress should fund CDC and its state, local, tribal, and territorial partners to provide training, support, and financial resources for community-based organizations to join in vaccination planning and implementation, including community outreach, training of providers, and participation in vaccination clinics. State, local, tribal, and territorial authorities should authentically engage and immediately begin vaccination planning with community-based organizations, community health workers/promotores de salud, faith leaders, educators, civic and tribal leaders, and other trusted organizations outside the clinical healthcare setting as key, funded partners.

Provide communities the information they need to understand the vaccine, make informed decisions, and deliver messages through trusted messengers and pathways.

  • Congress should provide at least $500 million to CDC for outreach, communication, and educational efforts to reach priority populations in order to increase vaccine confidence and combat misinformation. All communications must be culturally and linguistically appropriate and tailored as much as possible to reach diverse populations as well as generations within groups.
  • FDA and CDC should initiate early engagement with diverse national organizations and provide funding and guidance for state, local, tribal, and territorial planners to help shape messaging and engage locally with healthcare providers in communities of color and tribal communities, such as nurses, pharmacists, promotores de salud, community health workers, and others to ensure they have the information they need to feel comfortable recommending the vaccine to their patients. Congress and HHS should provide funding for training and engagement of trusted non-healthcare communicators to help shape messaging and to train informal networks, civic and lay leaders, and other trusted community leaders and community-based organizations to answer questions and encourage vaccination.
  • All messaging about the vaccine must be appropriate for all levels of health literacy. Communication should be realistic and clear about timelines and priority groups (and the rationale for these decisions), vaccine effectiveness, types of vaccines, the number of doses, costs, and the need for ongoing public health protections. Planners must provide information that meets people where they are (e.g., barber shops, bodegas, grocery stores, places of worship, etc.) and ensure that trusted messengers in those places have the information they need to be credible and authentic spokespeople.

 

Ensure that it is as easy as possible for people to be vaccinated. Vaccines must be delivered in community settings that are trusted, safe and accessible.

  • We urge the administration and Congress to appropriate the resources necessary to expand and strengthen federal, state, local, territorial, and tribal capacity for a timely, comprehensive, and equitable COVID-19 vaccination planning, communications, distribution, and administration campaign, including funding to support vaccine distribution at the local level and by community-based organizations.
  • Congress and HHS should allocate funding to increase access to vaccination services to ensure that people seeking to be vaccinated do not experience undue increased exposure to the virus as they travel to, move through, and return home from vaccination sites. Flexibility in funding is needed to enable transport of people to vaccination sites, increase accessibility to people without cars, and promote safety and minimize exposure at vaccination locations. Funding should also be provided to health and community-based agencies to assist those for whom transportation or childcare costs are an obstacle to receipt of the vaccine.
  • Planners should ensure that vaccination sites are located in areas that have borne a disproportionate burden of COVID-19, especially leveraging community-based organizations such as Federally Qualified Health Centers, community health centers, rural health centers, schools and places of worship. Mobile services will be particularly important in rural areas. Planners should prioritize congregate living facilities, such as long-term care, prisons, and homeless shelters. In addition, some families, displaced by the COVID economic fallout, may be living with relatives. Planners should ensure vaccination sites have services that meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and HHS Office for Civil Rights (OCR) standards for disability and language access.
  • Federal state, local, tribal, and territorial officials must guarantee and communicate with the public that immigration status is not a factor in people’s ability to receive the vaccine and that immigration status is not collected or reported by vaccination sites/providers. Similarly, the presence of law enforcement officers or military personnel could be a deterrent for vaccination at locations, so planners should consider other means of securing sites.
  • In the initial phase, as communities vaccinate healthcare workers, planners must be sure to prioritize home health, long-term care, and other non-hospital-based healthcare workers, who are more likely to be people of color. Other essential workers that comprise large numbers of workers who are people of color and should be treated as within the vaccination priority groups are the food service industry, farmworkers and public transportation employees.

Ensure complete coverage of the costs associated with the vaccine incurred by individuals, providers of the vaccine, and state/local/tribal/territorial governments responsible for administering the vaccine and communicating with their communities about it.

  • Congress, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and private payers must guarantee that people receiving the vaccine have zero out-of-pocket costs for the vaccine, related health care visits, or any adverse events related to the vaccine, regardless of their health insurance status.
  • HHS, with emergency funding from Congress, should provide funding so that state, local, tribal, and territorial governments do not bear any cost of vaccine communication efforts, working with their communities, organizing sites, training their staff, and providing personal protective equipment (PPE).

 Congress must provide additional funding and require disaggregated data collection and reporting by age, race, ethnicity, gender identity, primary language, disability status, and other demographic factors on vaccine trust and acceptance, access, vaccination rates, adverse experiences, and ongoing health outcomes.

  • CDC, and state, local, tribal, and territorial authorities should include leaders from communities of color and tribal communities and to plan on-going data collection on vaccination efforts, interpret data, add cultural context, share data with communities, and determine implications and next steps.
  • CDC, and state, local, tribal, and territorial authorities should use these data to inform ongoing prioritization of vaccine distribution and rapidly address gaps in vaccination that may arise among subpopulations by race, ethnicity, neighborhood, or housing setting.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. Twitter: @healthyamerica1

 

Los estados con mayor riesgo de impactos en la salud del cambio climático suelen estar menos preparados para proteger a los residentes durante eventos relacionados con el clima, según un nuevo informe

(Washington, DC y Baltimore, MD – 9 de diciembre de 2020) – Muchos de los estados con mayor riesgo de cambio climático también son los menos preparados para lidiar con él, según un nuevo informe publicado hoy por Trust for America’s Health y Escuela de Salud Pública Bloomberg de la Universidad Johns Hopkins. Este grupo de estados enfrenta mayores peligros, incluidos huracanes, inundaciones, olas de calor y enfermedades transmitidas por vectores, pero han hecho lo mínimo para prepararse, según el informe Cambio climático y salud: evaluación de la preparación estatal.

El informe evaluó los 50 estados y el Distrito de Columbia en su nivel de preparación para los efectos del cambio climático en la salud. Los investigadores encontraron una gran variación: algunos estados han hecho preparativos importantes, mientras que otros apenas han comenzado este proceso. Ocho estados en particular son los más vulnerables a los impactos del cambio climático en la salud y los menos preparados.

Los estados en el grupo más vulnerable / menos preparado fueron: Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Carolina del Sur, Tennessee, Texas y Virginia Occidental. En general, cuanto más vulnerable era un estado, menos preparado solía estar. Muchos de estos estados de alta vulnerabilidad / baja preparación se encuentran en el sureste o sur de las Grandes Llanuras.

“Queríamos comprender mejor los riesgos que se plantean a los estados individuales y su nivel de preparación para proteger a los residentes”, dijo el autor principal del informe, Matt McKillop. “Nuestra esperanza es que el informe brinde a los funcionarios de todos los niveles información útil para prepararse mejor”.

Otro grupo de estados ha hecho mucho más para prepararse. Este grupo incluye: Colorado, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Utah, Vermont, Wisconsin y el Distrito de Columbia. (Consulte el anexo para obtener un resumen de preparación estado por estado).

Los investigadores enfatizaron que todos los estados, incluidos los calificados como los más preparados, pueden hacer mucho más para proteger a los residentes de los efectos nocivos para la salud del cambio climático.

“Los impactos del cambio climático en nuestra salud exigen que los legisladores respondan”, dijo Megan Latshaw, científica de la Escuela de Salud Pública Johns Hopkins Bloomberg. “Nuestro objetivo es que todos los estados tomen esto como una llamada de atención y piensen en este informe como un punto de partida para hacer más para ayudar a que la vida de los residentes sea más segura”.

Algunos eventos relacionados con el clima, como huracanes e incendios forestales, tienen impactos obvios en la salud. Pero otros son más insidiosos, incluidas olas de calor más frecuentes; deterioro de la calidad del aire; inundaciones crónicas; y aumentos de enfermedades relacionadas con vectores, agua y alimentos. Estas amenazas ya existen. Pero el cambio climático los exacerba y también modifica o expande las regiones y poblaciones en riesgo. Además, todos estos efectos pueden afectar gravemente la salud mental y el bienestar.

Los investigadores calcularon la vulnerabilidad de cada estado analizando una variedad de factores. El medio ambiente y la geografía son cruciales, pero además, los factores sociales y demográficos también juegan un papel clave. Algunas poblaciones y comunidades son especialmente vulnerables. Los residentes de alto riesgo incluyen aquellos que son muy jóvenes o muy mayores, personas con discapacidades y quienes viven en la pobreza. A menudo, el legado y la presencia continua del racismo sistémico, incluidos los patrones de privación y discriminación, hace que las comunidades de color sean especialmente vulnerables.

El informe hace recomendaciones sobre cómo las autoridades federales, estatales y locales pueden hacer más para salvaguardar la salud de los residentes, particularmente la de los más vulnerables.

Las evaluaciones estatales se basaron en tres indicadores: vulnerabilidad, preparación para la salud pública y adaptación relacionada con el clima. Todos los hallazgos del informe son relativos, es decir, se basan en comparaciones entre estados.

Las recomendaciones incluyen:

Federal

  • El Congreso debería promulgar legislación que cree un plan nacional de preparación climática.
  • La administración y el Congreso deben financiar completamente el programa de Clima y Salud de los CDC y la Red Nacional de Seguimiento de la Salud Pública Ambiental.
  • Fortalecer el sistema nacional de salud pública y la fuerza laboral, incluso mediante la modernización de las capacidades de datos y vigilancia.

Estadal

  • Complete todos los pasos del marco de construcción de resiliencia contra los efectos climáticos (BRACE) de los CDC.
  • Reforzar la capacidad básica de preparación para la salud pública y establecer y mantener fondos y personal dedicados para los preparativos relacionados con el clima.
  • Planifique con las comunidades, no para ellas.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health es una organización no partidista sin fines de lucro que promueve la salud óptima para cada persona y comunidad y hace de la prevención de enfermedades y lesiones una prioridad nacional. En Twitter en: @healthyamerica1

La Escuela de Salud Pública Bloomberg de la Universidad de Johns Hopkins se dedica a la mejora de la salud de todas las personas a través del descubrimiento, la difusión y la traducción del conocimiento, y la educación de una comunidad global diversa de científicos investigadores, profesionales de la salud pública y otros.

Ensuring COVID-19 Vaccine Access, Safety, and Utilization: Building Vaccination Confidence in Communities of Color

This webinar comes at a critical juncture as COVID-19 vaccine development continues. As has been the case with previous public health emergencies, the COVID-19 pandemic is exposing racial inequities that have long existed in the U.S. Racial and ethnic disparities also continue in vaccine access, due to contributing factors such as lack of access to health coverage and care and issues of distrust.

Featured experts shared with policymakers and stakeholders the historical reasons for vaccine hesitancy in communities of color, highlighted ongoing vaccination disparities and discussed policy recommendations to build vaccine confidence and access in communities of color.

20 Public Health Organizations Condemn Herd Immunity Scheme for Controlling Spread of SARS-CoV-2

Great Barrington Declaration is not grounded in science and is dangerous

(Washington, DC – October 14, 2020) – SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19 has infected at least 7.8 million people in the United States and 38 million worldwide. It has led to over 215,000 deaths domestically, and more than 1 million globally – with deaths continuing to climb.

If followed, the recommendations in the Great Barrington Declaration would haphazardly and unnecessarily sacrifice lives. The declaration is not a strategy, it is a political statement. It ignores sound public health expertise. It preys on a frustrated populace. Instead of selling false hope that will predictably backfire, we must focus on how to manage this pandemic in a safe, responsible, and equitable way.

The suggestions put forth by the Great Barrington Declaration are NOT based in science.

  • There is no evidence that we are even remotely close to herd immunity. To the contrary, experts believe that 85 to 90 percent of the U.S. population is still at risk of contracting SARS-CoV-2. Herd immunity is achieved when the virus stops circulating because a large segment of the population has already been infected. Letting Americans get sick, rather than focusing on proven methods to prevent infections, could lead to hundreds of thousands of preventable illnesses and deaths.[i] It would also add greater risk in communities of color which have already experienced disproportionate impacts of the pandemic.
  • The declaration ignores what are our best tools to fight the virus, i.e. wearing masks, physical distancing, hand-washing, avoiding large crowds, strategic testing, rapid isolation of infected people and supportive quarantine for people who need to isolate.
  • We have seen the failure of the herd immunity experiment in nations such as Sweden, which has the highest mortality rate among Nordic countries.[ii] COVID-19 carries a much higher risk of severe disease and death than other infections where herd immunity was attempted before a vaccine was available.[iii] It is illogical to ignore public health and scientific evidence when so many lives are at stake.

Combatting the pandemic with lockdowns or full reopening is not a binary, either/or choice. We need to embrace common sense public health practices that allow for a safe reopening of the economy and a return to in-person work and learning while also using proven strategies to reduce the spread of the virus.

The declaration suggests a so-called focused protection approach. It suggests allowing the virus to spread unchecked among young people to create herd immunity in the entire population. This notion is dangerous because it puts the entire population, particularly the most vulnerable, at risk. Young people are not all healthy and they don’t live in vacuums.[iv] They interact with family members, co-workers and neighbors. Inviting increased rates of COVID-19 in young people will lead to increased infections rates among all Americans.

Public health guidance and requirements related to masking and physical distancing are not an impediment to normalcy – they are the path to a new normal. The goal is both public health safety and economic security; the two are not in conflict with one another, they are dependent on each other. We need to focus our efforts on the development and implementation of a national, science-based and ethical pandemic disease-control strategy.

The pandemic has created serious hardships on families’ economic security and on American’s mental health and well-being. What we need is a coordinated and robust national response including mask use, hand hygiene and physical distancing, while also ensuring social supports for those most vulnerable, including physical and mental health, and social factors.  What we do not need is wrong-headed proposals masquerading as science.


This statement was authored by:

American Public Health Association

Big Cities Health Coalition

Trust for America’s Health

American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare

Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology

Association of Public Health Laboratories

Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health

de Beaumont Foundation

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health

Los Angeles County Department of Public Health

National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Directors

National Association of County and City Health Officials

National Association for Rural Mental Health

National Network of Public Health Institutes

New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene

Nurses Who Vaccinate

Prevention Institute

Public Health Institute

Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies

Well Being Trust

 

[i] https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/88401

[ii] https://www.medpagetoday.com/infectiousdisease/covid19/88401

[iii] https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/from-our-experts/early-herd-immunity-against-covid-19-a-dangerous-misconception

[iv] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6941e1.htm?s_cid=mm6941e1_w

New Report Recommends Policies to Protect and Improve Americans’ Health by Transforming the Public Health System

Nation’s Public Health System Needs Sustained Attention and Investment; The Report Provides Action Plan for the Administration and Congress Taking Office in 2021

(Washington, DC – October 6, 2020) — The COVID-19 pandemic sharply illuminated weaknesses in the nation’s public health system and ways in which structural racism put communities of color at disproportionate risk of negative health outcomes, according to a new report, The Promise of Good Health for All: Transforming Public Health in America. The report was released today by Trust for America’s Health.  Among its findings is that the nation’s public health system is dangerously inadequate. The report offers a blueprint for policymakers taking office next year on how to strengthen the system, protect against health security threats, address the social determinants of health, and combat racism and other forms of discrimination that negatively affect community and individual health and resilience.

Americans are facing increasing environmental and weather-related threats from wildfires to hurricanes. Infectious disease outbreaks are a constant and complex risk as world travel allows small outbreaks to become worldwide threats in a matter of hours. Additionally, Americans have higher levels of chronic disease and mental health and substance misuse issues than ever before.  As a nation, we spend over $3 trillion annually on healthcare but lag behind other developed countries in practically every health metric. A key to addressing these threats to the nation’s health is a significant investment in the public health system, including programs rooted in prevention and working at the population health level. The report calls for an annual $4.5 billion investment in the nation’s public health infrastructure including in 21st century data systems and a robust public health workforce.

“Even before COVID-19, numerous health emergencies, including infectious disease outbreaks like measles, Zika and Ebola, the opioid epidemic, weather-related events and lung injuries due to vaping demonstrated the urgency of a strong public health system,” says John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health.

“Each of these emergencies brought short-term attention to the importance of the public health system, but short-term attention is not enough.  Without sustained investment the nation’s public health system we will not be ready to protect Americans’ lives and livelihoods during the next health emergency,” Auerbach said.

The conditions in which people live and work are key drivers of their health. Therefore, solutions to health risks and inequities largely exist outside the healthcare sector and reinforce the importance of investing in population health and the social determinants of health. Increasing the nation’s investment in health promotion and disease prevention will not only improve the quality of life for millions of Americans, it will help decrease the nation’s exploding healthcare spending.

The report focuses on five key priority areas:

PRIORITY 1: Make substantial and sustained investments in a more effective public health system including a highly-skilled public health workforce.

PRIORITY 2: Mobilize an all-out effort to combat racism and other forms of discrimination and to advance health equity by providing the conditions that optimize health.

PRIORITY 3: Address the social determinants of health including economic, social, and environmental factors that result in preventable illness, injuries and death.

PRIORITY 4: Proactively address threats to the nation’s health security.

PRIORITY 5: Improve health, safety, and well-being for all people by providing pathways to optimal health across the life span.


Among the report’s recommendations for federal policymakers are:

  • Strengthen and modernize the public health system by creating a $4.5 billion per year Public Health Infrastructure Fund to support foundational public health capabilities at the state, local, territorial and tribal levels.
  • Build 21st century public health surveillance systems at the federal, state and local levels to enable rapid detection and response to disease threats.
  • Create a Health Defense Operations budget designation to build sustainable funding for public health programs that prevent, detect and respond to outbreaks.
  • Make advancing health equity and eliminating health disparities a national priority with a senior-level, federal interdepartmental task force charged with adopting policies and programs in housing, employment, health, environmental justice and education that reduce health inequities and address the social determinants of health.
  • Expand grants to address health inequities and ensure funding is reaching under-resourced, marginalized, and disproportionately affected communities.
  • Prioritize increased funding for state, local, tribal and territorial public health emergency preparedness and response programs, such as CDC’s Public Health Emergency Preparedness program and HHS’s Hospital Preparedness Program.
  • Build surge capacity across the healthcare system and develop standards for healthcare facility readiness. Policymakers should provide payment incentives and reward facilities that maintain specialized disaster care capabilities.
  • Grow the CDC’s Climate and Health Program so it can support every state, large cities, territories and tribes to be climate-ready. Clean air and water regulations should be restored and strengthened, including the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act.
  • Increase research and effective messaging to build vaccine confidence and ensure that no person faces barriers to receiving all necessary vaccinations.
  • Promote optimal health across the lifespan through access to health insurance, job-protected paid leave for workers, and significant investments in programs proven to support families and improve health – from babies to older adults.

The report is endorsed by the American Public Health Association, the Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum, the Big Cities Health Coalition, the Public Health Institute, and the National Network of Public Health Institutes.

 

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. On Twitter at @HealthyAmerica1

TFAH Webinar Series: COVID-19- Special Issues and Reponses

Stay tuned for upcoming briefings and webinars

 

Previously Recorded Briefings & Webinars

State of Obesity: Better Policies for a Healthier America
Ensuring COVID-19 Vaccine Access, Safety, Utilization: Building Vaccination Confidence in Communities of Color
Ending the Triple Pandemic: Advancing Racial Equity by Promoting Health, Economic Opportunity, and Criminal Justice Reform
COVID-19 and the Impact on Communities of Color: Our Nation’s Inequities Exposed
Advancing Health Equity During and Beyond COVID-19: Addressing Housing and Homelessness
Mental Health and COVID-19: How the Pandemic Complicates Current Gaps in Care
Protecting Older Adults from the Harms of Social Isolation and Providing a Continuum of Care During COVID-19
Combating COVID-19 Why Paid Sick Leave Matters to Controlling its Spread

La tasa de obesidad en adultos de EE. UU. Supera el 42 por ciento; el más alto jamás registrado

Tener obesidad es un factor de riesgo de consecuencias graves durante el COVID; La pandemia podría aumentar los niveles de obesidad en el futuro debido al aumento de la inseguridad alimentaria.

(Washington, DC – September 17, 2020) – La tasa de obesidad en adultos de los Estados Unidos superó la marca del 40 por ciento por primera vez, situándose en 42,4 por ciento, según el reporte  State of Obesity: Better Policies for a Healthier America, publicado hoy por Trust for America’s Health (TFAH). La tasa nacional de obesidad en adultos ha aumentado en un 26 por ciento desde el 2008.

El informe, basado en parte en los datos recientemente publicados en el 2019 del Sistema de Vigilancia de Factores de Riesgo del Comportamiento (BFRSS) de los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (BFRSS) y el análisis de TFAH, proporciona anualmente las tasas de sobrepeso y obesidad en todo el país, incluso por edad, raza y estados de residencia.

Las tendencias demográficas y las condiciones de vida de las personas tienen un gran impacto en su capacidad para mantener un peso saludable. Generalmente, los datos muestran que cuanto más gana una persona, es menos probable que tenga obesidad. Las personas con menos educación también tienen más probabilidades de tener obesidad. Las comunidades rurales tienen tasas más altas de obesidad y obesidad severa que las áreas suburbanas y metropolitanas.

Factores socioeconómicos como la pobreza y la discriminación han contribuido a tasas más altas de obesidad entre ciertas poblaciones raciales y étnicas. Los adultos afroamericanos tienen el nivel más alto de obesidad adulta a nivel nacional con un 49,6 por ciento; esa tasa es impulsada en gran parte por una tasa de obesidad adulta entre las mujeres negras del 56,9 por ciento. Los adultos latinos tienen una tasa de obesidad del 44,8 por ciento. La tasa de obesidad para los adultos blancos es del 42,2 por ciento. Los adultos asiáticos tienen una tasa de obesidad general del 17,4 por ciento.

La obesidad y su impacto en la salud, incluidos los riesgos de COVID-19

La obesidad tiene serias consecuencias para la salud, incluyendo un mayor riesgo de diabetes tipo 2, presión arterial alta, aturdimiento y muchos tipos de cánceres. Se estima que la obesidad aumenta el gasto en atención médica en $ 149 mil millones al año (aproximadamente la mitad de los cuales son pagados por Medicare y Medicaid) y el sobrepeso y la obesidad es la razón más común por la que los adultos jóvenes no son elegibles para el servicio militar. Las preocupaciones sobre el impacto de la obesidad han adquirido nuevas dimensiones este año, ya que tener obesidad es una de las condiciones de salud subyacentes asociadas con las consecuencias más graves de la infección por el COVID, incluidas la hospitalización y la muerte. Estos nuevos datos significan que el 42 por ciento de todos los estadounidenses tienen un mayor riesgo de sufrir impactos graves, posiblemente fatales, en la salud por el COVID-19 debido a su peso y las condiciones de salud relacionadas con la obesidad.

“Para resolver la crisis de obesidad del país será necesario abordar las condiciones de la vida de las personas que conducen a la inseguridad alimentaria y crean obstáculos para tener mejores opciones de alimentos saludables y la actividad física segura. Esas condiciones incluyen pobreza, desempleo, viviendas segregadas y discriminación racial ”, dijo John Auerbach, presidente y director ejecutivo de Trust for America’s Health. “La pandemia de este año ha demostrado que estas afecciones no solo aumentan el riesgo de obesidad y enfermedades crónicas, sino que también aumentan el riesgo de los resultados más graves del COVID”.

La obesidad infantil también va en aumento

Las tasas de obesidad infantil también están aumentando según los últimos datos que muestran que el 19,3 por ciento de los jóvenes estadounidenses, de 2 a 19 años, tienen obesidad. A mediados de la década de 1970, el 5,5 por ciento de los jóvenes tenía obesidad. Tener sobrepeso u obesidad en la juventud los pone en mayor riesgo de tener obesidad y los riesgos para la salud relacionados en la edad adulta. Además, los niños presentan un inicio más temprano de lo que solían considerarse afecciones adultas, como la hipertensión y el colesterol alto.

Doce estados tienen tasas de obesidad en adultos superiores al 35 por ciento

Las tasas de obesidad varían considerablemente entre los estados y regiones del país. Mississippi tiene la tasa de obesidad adulta más alta del país con un 40,8 por ciento y Colorado tiene la más baja con un 23,8 por ciento. Doce estados tienen tasas de adultos superiores al 35 por ciento, son: Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Luisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Carolina del Sur, Tennessee y Virginia Occidental. Recientemente en el 2012, ningún estado tenía una tasa de obesidad en adultos superior al 35 por ciento; en el 2000 ningún estado tenía una tasa de obesidad en adultos superior al 25 por ciento.

Inseguridad alimentaria y su relación con la obesidad

El informe incluye una sección especial sobre la inseguridad alimentaria y su relación con la obesidad. La inseguridad alimentaria está relacionada con dietas de menor calidad y con niveles más altos de obesidad en muchos grupos de población. La inseguridad alimentaria está estrechamente vinculada a las condiciones económicas. Hubo niveles más altos de inseguridad alimentaria durante la crisis financiera del 2008-2009 y los primeros datos indican un gran aumento en el número de familias estadounidenses que están experimentando inseguridad alimentaria debido a la crisis del COVID-19. Según los datos de la encuesta de la Oficina del Censo de los Estados Unidos, el 25 por ciento de todos los encuestados y el 30 por ciento de los encuestados con niños informaron haber experimentado inseguridad alimentaria entre abril y junio de este año.

Resolver la crisis de la obesidad requerirá iniciativas multisectoriales y cambios de política

El informe incluye recomendaciones sobre la mejor manera de abordar la crisis de la obesidad basada en dos principios: 1) la necesidad de un enfoque multisectorial y multidisciplinario y 2) un enfoque en los grupos de población que se ven afectados de manera desproporcionada por la crisis de la obesidad.

Las recomendaciones incluyen:

  • Debido a que la emergencia de salud pública del COVID-19 continúa vigente, continuar con las exenciones de políticas de nutrición del Departamento de Agricultura (USDA) y expandir las comidas escolares sin costo para todos los estudiantes inscritos durante todo el año escolar 2020-2021.
  • Aumentar los fondos para permitir la expansión de los programas críticos de prevención de la obesidad de los CDC, incluido el Programa Estatal de Actividad Física y Nutrición y el programa Enfoques Raciales y Étnicos para la Salud Comunitaria.
  • Ampliar los beneficios en el Programa de Asistencia de Nutrición Suplementaria (SNAP, anteriormente conocido como “cupones de alimentos”) al aumentar los niveles máximos de beneficios, extender Pandemic-EBT (P-EBT) para estudiantes y niños, duplicar las inversiones en SNAP-Ed y encontrar formas voluntarias de mejorar la calidad de la dieta sin perjudicar el acceso o los niveles de beneficios.
  • Incentivar las empresas y el uso de la tierra pública para aumentar las opciones de alimentos saludables y lugares seguros para hacer actividad física.
  • Desincentivar las opciones de alimentos poco saludables cerrando los vacios fiscales y eliminando las deducciones de costos comerciales relacionadas con la publicidad de alimentos y bebidas poco saludables para los niños y promulgando impuestos a las bebidas azucaradas donde los ingresos fiscales se asignan a los esfuerzos locales para reducir las disparidades socioeconómicas y de salud.
  • Alentar a Medicaid a cubrir los programas pediátricos de control de peso para todos los beneficiarios elegibles.

 

El texto completo del informe está disponible

La Fundación Robert Wood Johnson proporcionó apoyo para la serie de Informes sobre el estado de la obesidad. Las opiniones expresadas en este informe no reflejan necesariamente la opinión de la Fundación.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health es una organización no partidista sin fines de lucro que promueve una salud óptima para cada persona y comunidad y hace de la prevención de enfermedades y lesiones una prioridad nacional.

TFAH and Other Leaders Launch Public Health Communications Collaborative to Support and Advance Public Health During COVID-19 Pandemic

(Washington, DC, September 2, 2020) – The Public Health Communications Collaborative (PHCC), launched today, will promote the value of public health to protect Americans’ health and safety as well as the nation’s economy. The collaborative will coordinate and amplify public health messaging on COVID-19 issues to increase Americans’ confidence in health guidance by communicating the best available science, by positioning public health leaders as expert spokespersons, and by quickly correcting misinformation.

“Unfortunately, misinformation and conflicting messages about COVID-19 have confused the American public at a time when clear guidance about how to protect their health is critical,” said John Auerbach, President, and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. “This collaborative will share information that will advance science-based decision making during the pandemic and in doing so will help save lives.”

Founding members of the PHCC are Trust for America’s Health, the CDC Foundation, and the de Beaumont Foundation. Partner organizations are the American Public Health Association, the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, the Big Cities Health Coalition, the National Association of County and City Health Officials, PATH, and Resolve to Save Lives.

The Public Health Communications Collaborative website will be a hub repository of information and messaging products designed to help state and local public health officials share information with their constituents and navigate the current media landscape. The site will be updated regularly with real-time messaging and resources.

To sign up for email updates from PHCC, visit the website.