Issue Category: Housing

Ensuring Health Equity During and Beyond COVID-19: Addressing Housing and Homelessness

Many Americans struggle to maintain a safe and healthy place to live. People who are housing insecure or experience homelessness typically have poorer physical and mental health outcomes and are at greater risk for infection during the COVID-19 pandemic, in addition to other challenges.

In response, solutions such as providing short-term housing arrangements for newly released low-level criminal justice offenders to rental assistance and freezes on evictions have been put in place to reduce the risk of exposure among vulnerable populations during the pandemic. However, these short-term solutions won’t be enough. Also required are sustainable long-term programs that equitably improve opportunities for individuals to live in safe and affordable housing.

This Webinar highlights the disproportionate and long-existing economic and health disparities among people who are housing insecure or experience homelessness. In addition, the webinar highlights what is currently being done to protect this population during the COVID-19 pandemic, and identify the long-term policy, system, and environmental changes that are needed to advance health equity by effectively addressing housing insecurity and homelessness.

New Report Shows Hamstrung COVID-19 Response was Years in the Making

Funding for public health preparedness and response programs lost ground in FY 2020 and over the past decade.

(Washington, DC – April 16, 2020) – Chronic underfunding of the nation’s public health and emergency preparedness systems has made the nation vulnerable to health security risks, including the novel coronavirus pandemic, according to a new report released today by Trust for America’s Health.

The report, The Impact of Chronic Underfunding on America’s Public Health System: Trends, Risks, and Recommendations, 2020, examines federal, state, and local public health funding trends and recommends investments and policy actions to build a stronger system, prioritize prevention, and effectively address twenty-first-century health risks.

“COVID-19 has shined a harsh spotlight on the country’s lack of preparedness for dealing with threats to Americans’ well-being,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. “Years of cutting funding for public health and emergency preparedness programs has left the nation with a smaller-than-necessary public health workforce, limited testing capacity, an insufficient national stockpile, and archaic disease tracking systems – in summary, twentieth-century tools for dealing with twenty-first-century challenges.”

Mixed Picture for CDC FY 2020 Funding

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the nation’s leading public health agency. The CDC’s overall budget for FY 2020 is $7.92 billion – a $645 million increase, 9 percent over FY 2019 CDC funding, 7 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars. The largest FY 2020 increase was a onetime investment in buildings and facilities (+$225 million). Other increases included funding for the Ending HIV initiative (+$140 million) and small increases for suicide and chronic disease prevention programs.

Emergency Preparedness Funding Down This Year and For Over a Decade

Funding for CDC’s public health preparedness and response programs decreased between the FY 2019 and FY 2020 budgets – down from $858 million in FY 2019 to $850 million in FY 2020.  CDC’s program funding for emergency preparedness in FY 2020 ($7.92 billion) is less than it was in FY 2011 ($7.99 billion in FY 2020 dollars), after adjusting for inflation.

Funding for state and local public health emergency preparedness and response programs has also been reduced, by approximately one-third since 2003. And, of critical concern now, funding for the Hospital Preparedness Program, the only federal source of funding to help the healthcare delivery system prepare for and respond to emergencies, has been cut by half since 2003.

Federal action to enact three supplemental funding packages to support the COVID-19 pandemic response was critical. But they are short-term adjustments that do not strengthen the core, long-term capacity of the public health system, according to the report’s authors.  Sustained annual funding increases are needed to ensure that our health security systems and public health infrastructure are up to the task of protecting all communities.

The nation’s habitual neglect of public health, except during emergencies, is a longstanding problem. “Emergencies that threaten Americans’ health and well-being are becoming more frequent and more severe. These include wildfires and flooding, the opioid crisis, the increase in obesity and chronic illness, and this year a measles outbreak, serious lung injuries due to vaping, and the worst pandemic in a century. We must begin making year-in and year-out investments in public health,” Auerbach said.

In addition to supporting federal activities, federal monies are also the primary source of funding for most state and local public health programs. During FY 2018, 55 percent of states’ public health expenditures, on average, were funded from federal sources. Therefore, federal spending cuts have a serious trickle-down effect on state and local programs. Between FY 2016 and FY 2018, state expenditures of federal monies for public health activities decreased from $16.3 billion to $12.8 billion.   On top of federal cuts, some states have also reduced public health funding.  More than 20 percent of states (eleven) cut their public health funding between 2018 and 2019.

These funding cuts have led to significant workforce reductions in state and local public health departments. In 2017, 51 percent of large local public health departments reported job losses.  Some of the positions lost were frontline public health staff who would have been mobilized to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report includes 28 policy recommendations to improve the country’s emergency preparedness in four priority areas:

  • increased funding to strengthen the public health infrastructure and workforce, including modernizing data systems and surveillance capacities.
  • improving emergency preparedness, including preparation for weather-related events and infectious disease outbreaks.
  • safeguarding and improving Americans’ health by investing in chronic disease prevention and the prevention of substance misuse and suicide.
  • addressing the social determinants of health and advancing health equity.

The report also endorses the call by more than 100 public health organizations for Congress to increase CDC’s budget by 22 percent by FY 2022.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. Twitter: @healthyamerica1

Protecting Older Adults from the Harms of Social Isolation and Providing a Continuum of Care During COVID19

The ongoing COVID-19 crisis presents unique challenges for the public health and aging sectors. While social distancing protects older adults who are at higher risk for complications from the virus, the practice can exacerbate social isolation, a longstanding issue for this population. The needs of older adults must be considered across a continuum of care from primary prevention to post-acute care in the coming months.

Trust For America’s Health Policy Development Manager, Megan Wolfe  for a Web Forum to discuss how to address the unique challenges that older adults face while adhering to public health advice to minimize risk of infection. Attendees will learn about the consequences of social isolation, how the aging services sector has adapted its delivery models, and hear about promising practices from the field and the importance of working with public health partners to address the needs of older adults.

Nuevo Informe Coloca A 25 Estados Y Distrito De Columbia En Un Nivel De Alto Rendimiento (10) en Medidas De Salud Pública Para Preparación De Emergencias

A medida que aumentan las amenazas, la evaluación anual determina que el nivel de preparación de los estados para emergencias sanitarias está mejorando en algunas áreas, pero está estancado en otras

(Washington, DC) – Veinticinco Estados y el Distrito de Columbia tuvieron un alto desempeño en una medida de tres niveles de preparación de los Estados para proteger la salud public durante una emergencia, según un nuevo informe publicado hoy por Trust for America’s Health (TFAH, por su sigla en inglés).  El informe anual, Ready or Not 2020: Proteging the Public’s Health from Diseases, Disasters and Bioterrorism, encontró una mejora año tras año entre las 10 medidas de preparación para emergencias, pero también señala áreas que necesitan mejoras. El año pasado, 17 Estados se clasificaron en el nivel superior del informe.

Para 2020, 12 Estados se ubicaron en el nivel de rendimiento medio, por debajo de 20 Estados y el Distrito de Columbia en el nivel medio el año pasado, y 13 se ubicaron en el nivel de rendimiento bajo, el mismo número que el año pasado.

El informe encontró que el nivel de preparación de los estados ha mejorado en áreas claves, que incluyen fondos de salud pública, participación en coaliciones y pactos de atención médica, seguridad hospitalaria y vacunación contra la gripe. Sin embargo, otras medidas clave de seguridad de la salud, que incluyen garantizar un suministro de agua seguro y acceso a tiempo libre remunerado, está estancado o perdido.

Nivel de Rendimiento Estados Numero de Estados
Alto AL, CO, CT, DC, DE, IA, ID, IL, KS, MA, MD, ME, MO, MS, NC, NE, NJ,
NM, OK, PA, TN, UT, VA, VT, WA, W		 25 Estados y DC
Medio AZ, CA, FL, GA, KY, LA, MI, MN, ND, OR, RI, TX 12 Estados

Bajo		 AK, AR, HI, IN, MT, NH, NV, NY, OH, SC, SD, WV, WY 13 Estados

 

El informe mide el desempeño anualmente de los Estados utilizando 10 indicadores que, en conjunto, proporcionan una lista de verificación del nivel de preparación de una jurisdicción para prevenir y responder a las amenazas a la salud de sus residentes durante una emergencia. Los indicadores son:

Indicadores de Preparación
1 Gestión de incidentes: adopción del Pacto de licencia de enfermería 6 Seguridad del agua: Porcentaje de la población que utilizó un sistema de agua comunitario que no cumplió con todos los estándares de salud aplicables.
2 Colaboración comunitaria intersectorial: porcentaje de hospitales que participan en coaliciones de atención médica. 7 Resistencia laboral y control de infecciones: porcentaje de población ocupada con tiempo libre remunerado.
3 Calidad institucional: acreditación de la Junta de Acreditación de Salud Pública 8 Utilización de contramedidas: porcentaje de personas de 6 meses o más que recibieron una vacuna contra la gripe estacional.
4 Calidad institucional: acreditación del Programa de acreditación de gestión de emergencias. 9 Seguridad del paciente: porcentaje de hospitales con una clasificación de alta calidad (grado “A”) en el grado de seguridad del hospital Leapfrog.
5 Calidad institucional: tamaño del presupuesto estatal de salud pública, en comparación con el año pasado. 10 Vigilancia de la seguridad de la salud: el laboratorio de salud pública tiene un plan para un aumento de la capacidad de prueba de seis a ocho semanas.

Cuatro Estados (Delaware, Pensilvania, Tennessee y Utah) pasaron del nivel de bajo rendimiento en el informe del año pasado al nivel alto en el informe de este año. Seis Estados (Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Nuevo México, Oklahoma, Vermont) y el Distrito de Columbia pasaron del nivel medio al nivel alto. Ningún Estado cayó del nivel alto al bajo, pero seis pasaron del nivel medio al bajo: Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Carolina del Sur y Virginia Occidental.

“El creciente número de amenazas para la salud de los estadounidenses en 2019, desde inundaciones hasta incendios forestales y vapeo, demuestra la importancia crítica de un sistema de salud pública sólido. Estar preparado es a menudo la diferencia entre daños o no daños durante emergencias de salud y requiere cuatro cosas: planificación, financiamiento dedicado, cooperación interinstitucional y jurisdiccional, y una fuerza laboral calificada de salud pública “, dijo John Auerbach, presidente y CEO de Trust for America’s Health.

“Si bien el informe de este año muestra que, como nación, estamos más preparados para enfrentar emergencias de salud pública, todavía no estamos tan preparados como deberíamos estar”. Se necesita más planificación e inversión para salvar vidas”, dijo Auerbach.

El análisis de TFAH encontró que:

  • La mayoría de los Estados tienen planes para expandir la capacidad de atención médica en una emergencia a través de programas como el Pacto de Licencias de Enfermería u otras coaliciones de atención médica. Treinta y dos Estados participaron en el Pacto de Licencias de Enfermeras, que permite a las enfermeras licenciadas practicar en múltiples jurisdicciones durante una emergencia. Además, el 89 por ciento de los hospitales a nivel nacional participaron en una coalición de atención médica, y 17 estados y el Distrito de Columbia tienen participación universal, lo que significa que todos los hospitales del estado (+ DC) participaron en una coalición. Además, 48 ​​Estados y DC tenían un plan para aumentar la capacidad del laboratorio de salud pública durante una emergencia.
  • La mayoría de los Estados están acreditados en las áreas de salud pública, manejo de emergencias o ambos. Dicha acreditación ayuda a garantizar que los sistemas necesarios de prevención y respuesta ante emergencias estén implementados y que cuenten con personal calificado.
  • La mayoría de las personas que tienen agua de su hogar a través de un sistema de agua comunitario tenían acceso a agua segura. Según los datos de 2018, en promedio, solo el 7 por ciento de los residentes estatales obtuvieron el agua de su hogar de un sistema de agua comunitario que no cumplía con los estándares de salud aplicables, un poco más del 6 por ciento en 2017.
  • Las tasas de vacunación contra la gripe estacional mejoraron, pero aún son demasiado bajas. La tasa de vacunación contra la gripe estacional entre los estadounidenses de 6 meses en adelante aumentó del 42 por ciento durante la temporada de gripe 2017-2018 al 49 por ciento durante la temporada 2018-2019, pero las tasas de vacunación todavía están muy por debajo del objetivo del 70 por ciento establecido por Healthy People 2020.
  • En 2019, solo el 55 por ciento de las personas empleadas tenían acceso a tiempo libre remunerado, el mismo porcentaje que en 2018. Se ha demostrado que la ausencia de tiempo libre remunerado exacerba algunos brotes de enfermedades infecciosas. También puede evitar que las personas reciban atención preventiva.
  • Solo el 30 por ciento de los hospitales, en promedio, obtuvieron las mejores calificaciones de seguridad del paciente, un poco más que el 28 por ciento en 2018. Los puntajes de seguridad hospitalaria miden el desempeño en temas tales como las tasas de infección asociadas a la atención médica, la capacidad de cuidados intensivos y una cultura general de prevención de errores. Dichas medidas son críticas para la seguridad del paciente durante los brotes de enfermedades infecciosas y también son una medida de la capacidad del hospital para funcionar bien durante una emergencia.

Otras secciones del informe describen cómo el sistema de salud pública fue fundamental para la respuesta a la crisis de vapeo, cómo las inequidades en salud ponen a algunas comunidades en mayor riesgo durante una emergencia y las necesidades de las personas con discapacidad durante una emergencia.

Se puede acceder al informe completo en Ready or Not 2020 report.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health es una organización sin fines de lucro y no partidista que promueve la salud óptima para cada persona y comunidad y hace de la prevención de enfermedades y lesiones una prioridad nacional. www.tfah.org. Twitter: @ healthyamerica1

New Report Places 25 States and DC in High Performance Tier on 10 Public Health Emergency Preparedness Measures

As Threats Increase, Annual Assessment Finds States’ Level of Readiness for Health Emergencies is Improving in Some Areas but Stalled in Others

February 5, 2020

(Washington, DC) – Twenty-five states and the District of Columbia were high-performers on a three-tier measure of states’ preparedness to protect the public’s health during an  emergency, according to a new report released today by Trust for America’s Health (TFAH). The annual report, Ready or Not 2020: Protecting the Public’s Health from Diseases, Disasters, and Bioterrorism, found year-over-year improvement among 10 emergency readiness measures, but also notes areas in need of improvement. Last year, 17 states ranked in the report’s top tier.

For 2020, 12 states placed in the middle performance tier, down from 20 states and the District of Columbia in the middle tier last year, and 13 placed in the low performance tier, the same number as last year.

The report found that states’ level of preparedness has improved in key areas, including public health funding, participation in healthcare coalitions and compacts, hospital safety, and seasonal flu vaccination. However, other key health security measures, including ensuring a safe water supply and access to paid time off, stalled or lost ground.

Performance Tier States Number of States
High Tier AL, CO, CT, DC, DE, IA, ID, IL, KS, MA, MD, ME, MO,
MS, NC, NE, NJ, NM, OK, PA, TN, UT, VA, VT, WA, WI		 25 states and DC
Middle Tier AZ, CA, FL, GA, KY, LA, MI, MN, ND, OR, RI, TX 12 states
Low Tier AK, AR, HI, IN, MT, NH, NV, NY, OH, SC, SD, WV, WY 13 states

 

The report measures states’ performance on an annual basis using 10 indicators that, taken together, provide a checklist of a jurisdiction’s level of preparedness to prevent and respond to threats to its residents’ health during an emergency. The indicators are:

Preparedness Indicators 
1 Incident Management: Adoption of the Nurse Licensure Compact. 6 Water Security: Percentage of the population who used a community water system that failed to meet all applicable health-based standards.
2 Cross-Sector Community collaboration: Percentage of hospitals participating in healthcare coalitions. 7 Workforce Resiliency and Infection Control: Percentage of employed population with paid time off.
3 Institutional Quality: Accreditation by the Public Health Accreditation Board. 8 Countermeasure Utilization: Percentage of people ages 6 months or older who received a seasonal flu vaccination.
4 Institutional Quality: Accreditation by the Emergency Management Accreditation Program. 9 Patient Safety: Percentage of hospitals with a top-quality ranking (“A” grade) on the Leapfrog Hospital Safety Grade.
5 Institutional Quality: Size of the state public health budget, compared with the past year. 10 Health Security Surveillance: The public health laboratory has a plan for a six-to eight-week surge in testing capacity.

Four states (Delaware, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Utah) moved from the low performance tier in last year’s report to the high tier in this year’s report. Six states (Illinois, Iowa, Maine, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Vermont) and the District of Columbia moved up from the middle tier to the high tier. No state fell from the high to the low tier but six moved from the middle to the low tier. Hawaii, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and West Virginia.

“The increasing number of threats to Americans’ health in 2019, from floods to wildfires to vaping, demonstrate the critical importance of a robust public health system. Being prepared is often the difference between harm or no harm during health emergencies and requires four things: planning, dedicated funding, interagency and jurisdictional cooperation, and a skilled public health workforce,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health.

“While this year’s report shows that, as a nation, we are more prepared to deal with public health emergencies, we’re still not as prepared as we should be. More planning and investment are necessary to saves lives,” Auerbach said.

TFAH’s analysis found that:

  • A majority of states have plans in place to expand healthcare capacity in an emergency through programs such as the Nurse Licensure Compact or other healthcare coalitions. Thirty-two states participated in the Nurse Licensure Compact, which allows licensed nurses to practice in multiple jurisdictions during an emergency. Furthermore, 89 percent of hospitals nationally participated in a healthcare coalition, and 17 states and the District of Columbia have universal participation meaning every hospital in the state (+DC)  participated in a coalition. In addition, 48 states and DC had a plan to surge public health laboratory capacity during an emergency.
  • Most states are accredited in the areas of public health, emergency management, or both. Such accreditation helps ensure that necessary emergency prevention and response systems are in place and staffed by qualified personnel.
  • Most people who got their household water through a community water system had access to safe water. Based on 2018 data, on average, just 7 percent of state residents got their household water from a community water system that did not meet applicable health standards, up slightly from 6 percent in 2017.
  • Seasonal flu vaccination rates improved but are still too low. The seasonal flu vaccination rate among Americans ages 6 months and older rose from 42 percent during the 2017-2018 flu season to 49 percent during the 2018-2019 season, but vaccination rates are still well below the 70 percent target established by Healthy People 2020.
  • In 2019, only 55 percent of employed people had access to paid time off, the same percentage as in 2018. The absence of paid time off has been shown to exacerbate some infectious disease outbreaks . It can also prevent people from getting preventive care.
  • Only 30 percent of hospitals, on average, earned top patient safety grades, up slightly from 28 percent in 2018. Hospital safety scores measure performance on such issues as healthcare associated infection rates, intensive-care capacity and an overall culture of error prevention. Such measures are critical to patient safety during infectious disease outbreaks and are also a measure of a hospital’s ability to perform well during an emergency.

The report includes recommended policy actions that the federal government, states and the healthcare sector  should take to improve the nation’s ability to protect the public’s health during emergencies.

Other sections of the report describe how the public health system was critical to the vaping crisis response, how health inequities put some communities at greater risk during an emergency, and the needs of people with disabilities during an emergency.

Read the full text report

States Can Improve Residents’ Health and Reduce Healthcare Spending by Adopting Policies Outside of the Healthcare Sector, New Report Shows

February 21, 2019

Policies that can improve health and save money include: Pre-K and school nutrition programs, syringe access, tobacco and alcohol taxes, paid family leave, the Earned Income Tax Credit and rapid rehousing.

(Washington, DC) — States can improve their residents’ health and well-being, and lower healthcare costs, by implementing a range of policies in sectors beyond healthcare, according to a new report, Promoting Health and Cost Control: How States Can Improve Community Health and Well-being through Policy Change, released today by Trust for America’s Health (TFAH).

The new report analyzes state action on 13 policies outside the healthcare sector that have a long-term impact on health and an evidence base showing their effectiveness. They include: tobacco and alcohol taxes, syringe access programs, universal pre-K and rapid rehousing laws, among others. The wide policy lens of the report, which covers numerous sectors, including taxation, employment, education, housing and transportation, underscores the many economic and social factors beyond medical care that influence health.

In the context of the longest decline in life expectancy since World War I, and, insufficient resources dedicated to preventing health problems before they arise, this new report serves as an urgent call to state policymakers to take concrete steps to improve residents’ health. The report was made possible by financial support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Kaiser Permanente.

“In the current environment, states have an even more vital role to play in promoting the health and well-being of their residents,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. “Our goal in creating this report is to provide state public health officials and policymakers the evidence and business case for the adoption of policies that have been shown to improve community health.”

Policies Analyzed in the Report Number of States with the Policy
Universal Pre-K program* 10 (incl. DC)
School breakfast program 31 (incl. DC)
School lunch program 20
School competitive foods (snacks and drinks) 28 (incl. DC)
Syringe access programs 27 (incl. DC)
Smoke-free laws** 29 (incl. DC)
Tobacco taxes*** 51 (incl. DC)
Alcohol taxes*** 51 (incl. DC)
Complete streets 30 (incl. DC)
Housing rehabilitation loan and grant programs**** 40 (incl. DC)
Rapid re-housing laws 9 (incl. DC)
Earned income tax credit 30 (incl. DC)
Paid sick leave 12 (incl. DC)
Paid family leave 7 (incl. DC)
Fair hiring protections (ban the box) 34 (incl. DC)

The economic benefits of these policies can be substantial. For example:

  • Pre-K education programs can generate $4.63 in benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others in society for every $1 spent on such programs.
  • Expanding syringe exchange programs could return $7.58 for every $1 invested in the long run, by lowering HIV rates and reducing treatment costs. There is no evidence such programs lead to higher drug use.
  • Rapid re-housing programs, which focus on getting homeless individuals into stable housing before addressing other challenges, can reduce hospital admissions and jail bookings. One pilot study found that such an approach saved more than $36,000 in treatment costs per person over the course of a year, nearly twice what the program cost.

“While the healthcare sector plays an important role in providing health services when someone gets sick, many of the factors that keep people healthy are outside the healthcare system and involve where people live, work, play and learn,” said Adam Lustig, Manager of the Promoting Health and Cost Control in States initiative and one of the report authors.  “This report gives state policymakers a menu of evidence-based policies that have been shown to improve individual and community health.”

“I encourage all state policymakers to read this important report.  Doing so will give them access to proven solutions to the challenge of run-away healthcare spending yet so little improvement in health outcomes. To improve Americans’ health, we have to think beyond the healthcare sector and about the many factors that impact health,” said Anand Parekh, MD, MPH, Chief Medical Advisor, Bipartisan Policy Center and a member of the Promoting Health and Cost Control in States Advisory Board.

To create the report, TFAH reviewed approximately 1,500 evidence-based programs and strategies.  The 13 policies ultimately included in the report all:

  • Have a strong health impact and economic evidence of that impact, such as cost avoidance or reduction.
  • Focus on prevention at the population health level, i.e., are designed to prevent illness or injury at the community level rather than the individual level.
  • Focus on primary prevention, preventing an injury or illness rather than treating it.
  • Can be implemented by state legislative action.

The findings show dramatic variability in how states approach these health-promoting policies. For instance, all 50 states plus DC institute tobacco and alcohol taxes. But only nine states and DC have laws in place to encourage universal pre-K programs, which have been shown to set children up for better health later in life. Universal pre-K programs are state funded programs that support pre-K for nearly 50 percent or more of the state’s 4-year-olds. Only six states and DC support paid family leave, even though data show such policies support maternal and child health, and, can save employers money in the long run.

“Action is imperative,” said Auerbach.  “As a nation, we spend trillions of dollars a year on healthcare and yet Americans are getting less healthy.  The solution is two-fold: direct more spending to prevention efforts and address the social determinants of health instead of their impact after someone is sick.”

Notes:
*states that support state-funded pre-K to nearly 50% or more of the state’s 4-year-olds.
**comprehensive smoke-free as per the American Lung Association
*** rates vary, and higher taxes are generally more effective
**** many states fund such programs in the absence of statewide legislation

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority.  www.tfah.org