Issue Category: Child and School Health
Promoting Health and Cost Control in States
States Can Improve Residents’ Health and Reduce Healthcare Spending by Adopting Policies Outside of the Healthcare Sector, New Report Shows
February 21, 2019
Policies that can improve health and save money include: Pre-K and school nutrition programs, syringe access, tobacco and alcohol taxes, paid family leave, the Earned Income Tax Credit and rapid rehousing.
(Washington, DC) — States can improve their residents’ health and well-being, and lower healthcare costs, by implementing a range of policies in sectors beyond healthcare, according to a new report, Promoting Health and Cost Control: How States Can Improve Community Health and Well-being through Policy Change, released today by Trust for America’s Health (TFAH).
The new report analyzes state action on 13 policies outside the healthcare sector that have a long-term impact on health and an evidence base showing their effectiveness. They include: tobacco and alcohol taxes, syringe access programs, universal pre-K and rapid rehousing laws, among others. The wide policy lens of the report, which covers numerous sectors, including taxation, employment, education, housing and transportation, underscores the many economic and social factors beyond medical care that influence health.
In the context of the longest decline in life expectancy since World War I, and, insufficient resources dedicated to preventing health problems before they arise, this new report serves as an urgent call to state policymakers to take concrete steps to improve residents’ health. The report was made possible by financial support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Kaiser Permanente.
“In the current environment, states have an even more vital role to play in promoting the health and well-being of their residents,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. “Our goal in creating this report is to provide state public health officials and policymakers the evidence and business case for the adoption of policies that have been shown to improve community health.”
Policies Analyzed in the Report | Number of States with the Policy |
Universal Pre-K program* | 10 (incl. DC) |
School breakfast program | 31 (incl. DC) |
School lunch program | 20 |
School competitive foods (snacks and drinks) | 28 (incl. DC) |
Syringe access programs | 27 (incl. DC) |
Smoke-free laws** | 29 (incl. DC) |
Tobacco taxes*** | 51 (incl. DC) |
Alcohol taxes*** | 51 (incl. DC) |
Complete streets | 30 (incl. DC) |
Housing rehabilitation loan and grant programs**** | 40 (incl. DC) |
Rapid re-housing laws | 9 (incl. DC) |
Earned income tax credit | 30 (incl. DC) |
Paid sick leave | 12 (incl. DC) |
Paid family leave | 7 (incl. DC) |
Fair hiring protections (ban the box) | 34 (incl. DC) |
The economic benefits of these policies can be substantial. For example:
- Pre-K education programs can generate $4.63 in benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others in society for every $1 spent on such programs.
- Expanding syringe exchange programs could return $7.58 for every $1 invested in the long run, by lowering HIV rates and reducing treatment costs. There is no evidence such programs lead to higher drug use.
- Rapid re-housing programs, which focus on getting homeless individuals into stable housing before addressing other challenges, can reduce hospital admissions and jail bookings. One pilot study found that such an approach saved more than $36,000 in treatment costs per person over the course of a year, nearly twice what the program cost.
“While the healthcare sector plays an important role in providing health services when someone gets sick, many of the factors that keep people healthy are outside the healthcare system and involve where people live, work, play and learn,” said Adam Lustig, Manager of the Promoting Health and Cost Control in States initiative and one of the report authors. “This report gives state policymakers a menu of evidence-based policies that have been shown to improve individual and community health.”
“I encourage all state policymakers to read this important report. Doing so will give them access to proven solutions to the challenge of run-away healthcare spending yet so little improvement in health outcomes. To improve Americans’ health, we have to think beyond the healthcare sector and about the many factors that impact health,” said Anand Parekh, MD, MPH, Chief Medical Advisor, Bipartisan Policy Center and a member of the Promoting Health and Cost Control in States Advisory Board.
To create the report, TFAH reviewed approximately 1,500 evidence-based programs and strategies. The 13 policies ultimately included in the report all:
- Have a strong health impact and economic evidence of that impact, such as cost avoidance or reduction.
- Focus on prevention at the population health level, i.e., are designed to prevent illness or injury at the community level rather than the individual level.
- Focus on primary prevention, preventing an injury or illness rather than treating it.
- Can be implemented by state legislative action.
The findings show dramatic variability in how states approach these health-promoting policies. For instance, all 50 states plus DC institute tobacco and alcohol taxes. But only nine states and DC have laws in place to encourage universal pre-K programs, which have been shown to set children up for better health later in life. Universal pre-K programs are state funded programs that support pre-K for nearly 50 percent or more of the state’s 4-year-olds. Only six states and DC support paid family leave, even though data show such policies support maternal and child health, and, can save employers money in the long run.
“Action is imperative,” said Auerbach. “As a nation, we spend trillions of dollars a year on healthcare and yet Americans are getting less healthy. The solution is two-fold: direct more spending to prevention efforts and address the social determinants of health instead of their impact after someone is sick.”
Notes:
*states that support state-funded pre-K to nearly 50% or more of the state’s 4-year-olds.
**comprehensive smoke-free as per the American Lung Association
*** rates vary, and higher taxes are generally more effective
**** many states fund such programs in the absence of statewide legislation
# # #
Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. www.tfah.org
Countering Childhood Obesity in Georgia
Countering Childhood Obesity in Georgia
Georgia Shape, a statewide multifaceted initiative, seeks to advance the health and well-being of children by utilizing a cross-sectors approach to tackle childhood obesity in the state.
By cultivating strong relationships with institutions throughout the State, Georgia Shape has been able to focus on upstream interventions, namely providing time in each students’ day for physical activity. Upstream interventions refer to programs and policies that impact the root causes of health or social conditions.
Through the development of community-wide interventions, particularly Georgia Shapes’ ‘Power Up for 30’ program, rates of childhood obesity in Georgia have started to decrease. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention recognizes school based programs to increase physical activity, such as ‘Power Up for 30’, as one of fourteen non-clinical community-wide interventions that can lead to cost-effective and cost-saving health outcomes within five years.
How It Took ‘Shape’
After the implementation of the 2009 Georgia Student Health and Physical Education Act (SHAPE), Georgia Shape was created to end the increasing rates of obesity among children in the state. In 2011, the Governor declared childhood obesity prevention as the number one public health priority and state leaders understood the importance of bridging the efforts of multi-sector partners to bolster the goals set forth by SHAPE. A governing council comprised of experts from a variety of disciplines was established to ensure that multiple perspectives were considered. Through the utilization of an obesity systems modelling program, factors contributing to obesity were identified, including a substantial lack of physical activity.
The overall goal of Power Up for 30 is to promote and protect the health of all children by incorporating 30 minutes of physical activity before, during, or after each school day. In collaboration with researchers, the Georgia Department of Public Health developed a comprehensive model to strategically focus and measure the health and economic impacts of school-based programs to increase physical activity.
The Power Up for 30 Model
Implementation of ‘Power Up for 30’ in schools relied on the support and acceptance of school superintendents and educators. Georgia Shape was promoted throughout elementary schools with messaging tailored to the interests of teachers and administrators to help garner support and establish applicability for the intervention. Tailored messages emphasized the benefits school principals, physical education teachers, and classroom teachers each prioritized including improved attendance and discipline, improved health, and improved academic performance. By identifying perceived barriers in each school, program developers were able to mold ‘Power Up For 30’ to fit each school’s specific environment and/or needs and assist teachers and administrators in achieving their respective goals.
School Based Activity Programs Increase | School Based Activity Programs Decrease |
● School attendance
● Academic performance ● Concentration and attention in the classroom ● Scores on State competency tests ● Physically activity in the classroom |
● Childhood Obesity
● Number of students receiving discipline ● Negative health outcomes |
Shape encouraged the utilization of physically active academic lessons as both a supplement to physical education in schools and to complement student learning. Former teachers served as subject matter experts to ensure the design of the program incorporated the realities of what would work in the classroom. Furthermore, the former teachers lent their knowledge of the unique needs of specific communities, which helped increase the programs ability to fit the diverse norms of different school environments.
In order to measure the effects of the intervention, the program assessed health knowledge, classroom physical activity time, time spent doing moderate to vigorous activity during physical education, availability of before school activity programs, and student aerobic capacity and BMI. For each school, data was compiled to discern the best available strategies for increasing physical activity within their individual environments. Buy-in and engagement was created at the individual school levels by training at least one administrator, one physical education teacher, and one classroom teacher to lead the ‘Power Up for 30’ program in their respective schools. Cultivating within-the-school leaders for the Power Up 30 program was a key to its success.
Success and Sustainability
At the beginning of 2012 the Power Up for 30 program launched across 40 Georgia elementary schools. ‘Power Up for 30’ expanded from a 5-county pilot program to a statewide approach by the 2013-2014 school year. As of 2016, more than 880 schools enlisted in Power Up for 30. Initially an elementary school pilot, ‘Power Up for 30’ is now embedded into Georgia’s elementary school educational curriculum and augmented to incorporate a middle school pilot.
Georgia Shape’s success in large part is due to its more than 120 partnerships and its sustainable and adaptable practices. Through utilizing evidence-based and sustainable models such as online training modules, low or no cost resources, free training, and continuous technical support, the Power Up for 30 program supports the implementation needs of all schools and educators. Assistance from public and private sector partners, such as the Georgia Department of Education, Department of Child and Family Services, the CDC, and corporate sponsors have been vital to Georgia Shapes’ achievements in tackling childhood obesity and protecting the health of every child.
For more information visit:
(December 2018)
Separating parents and children at US border is inhumane and sets the stage for a public health crisis
(Washington, D.C., June 15, 2018) — “The Trump administration’s policy of separating parents and children at the U.S.-Mexico border will have a dire impact on their health, both now and into the future.
“As public health professionals we know that children living without their parents face immediate and long-term health consequences. Risks include the acute mental trauma of separation, the loss of critical health information that only parents would know about their children’s health status, and in the case of breastfeeding children, the significant loss of maternal child bonding essential for normal development. Parents’ health would also be affected by this unjust separation.
“More alarming is the interruption of these children’s chance at achieving a stable childhood. Decades of public health research have shown that family structure, stability and environment are key social determinants of a child’s and a community’s health.
“Furthermore, this practice places children at heightened risk of experiencing adverse childhood events and trauma, which research has definitively linked to poorer long-term health. Negative outcomes associated with adverse childhood events include some of society’s most intractable health issues: alcoholism, substance misuse, depression, suicide, poor physical health and obesity.
“There is no law requiring the separation of parents and children at the border. This policy violates fundamental human rights. We urge the administration to immediately stop the practice of separating immigrant children and parents and ensure those who have been separated are rapidly reunited, to ensure the health and well-being of these children.”
###
APHA champions the health of all people and all communities. We strengthen the public health profession. We speak out for public health issues and policies backed by science. We are the only organization influence federal policy, has a nearly 150-year perspective and brings together members from all fields of public health. Visit us at www.apha.org.
Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. Twitter: @HealthyAmerica1
School health officials meet to advance policies to build student success
Healthy Students, Promising Futures Learning Collaborative: 2018 Agenda
June 14, 2018
The agenda has been released for the 2018 Healthy Students, Promising Futures Learning Collaborative. Click “View the full story” to read it.
View the full story (some sites require registration)
Pain in the Nation: Education Brief
Pain in the Nation: Education Brief
Child and School Health
Healthy students are better learners, yet many schools are not able to deliver the conditions that support student health – conditions such as access to in-school health services, a clean and safe school building, nutritious food, and time and appropriate space for physical activities.
Delivering health services in schools is a key strategy for improving access to healthcare for children, including those in underserved populations. Furthermore, incorporating health and wellness into schools’ culture and environment will help close the educational achievement gap and put today’s students on a path to healthy and productive lives.
Leading Public Health Groups: Using the Prevention Fund to help fund CHIP: A Serious Mistake
Statement from Trust for America’s Health, American Public Health Association, National Association of County and City Health Officials, Prevention Institute, and Public Health Institute
December 22, 2017
Washington, D.C., December 22, 2017 –It is a serious mistake to cut $750 million from the Prevention and Public Health Fund to provide very short-term funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and community health centers. The below is a statement from the American Public Health Association, National Association of County and City Health Officials, Prevention Institute, Public Health Institute, and Trust for America’s Health:
“The Prevention Fund supports critical public health activities—including lead poisoning surveillance, vaccination initiatives and other programs—in every state and community across the country. Cutting this significant funding source would leave communities without the vital resources needed to keep children and families happy, healthy and safe.
It is even more alarming and contradictory that this cut will be used to provide very short-term funding for CHIP and community health centers. Our organizations are united in support of CHIP and community health centers, which are vital to improving children’s health. But losing the Prevention Fund would just create another hole in the public health support children need.
The Prevention Fund is supported strongly by national, state and local groups alike—indeed to-date 1,142 have joined the Prevention Fund supporter’s list. They know the value of the $630 million annually that goes directly to states and communities to prevent illness and disease.
A strong public health system makes the difference between health and illness, safety and injury, life and death.
We urge Congress to oppose any and all future cuts to the Prevention Fund and to begin the long-overdue process of increasing support to CHIP, community health centers, CDC and other public health agencies so today’s children can be our healthiest and happiest generation.”
John Auerbach, President & CEO, Trust for America’s Health
Georges C. Benjamin, MD, Executive Director, American Public Health Association
Larry Cohen, Executive Director, Prevention Institute
Laura Hanen, MPP, Interim Executive Director and Chief of Government Affairs, National Association of County and City Health Officials
Mary A. Pittman, President & CEO, Public Health Institute
###
Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority. www.healthyamericans.org
The American Public Health Association champions the health of all people and all communities. We strengthen the public health profession. We speak out for public health issues and policies backed by science. We are the only organization that combines a 145-year perspective, a broad-based member community and the ability to influence federal policy to improve the public’s health. Visit us at www.apha.org.
The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) represents the nation’s nearly 3,000 local governmental health departments. These city, county, metropolitan, district, and tribal departments work every day to protect and promote health and well-being for all people in their communities. For more information about NACCHO, please visit www.naccho.org.
The Public Health Institute, an independent nonprofit organization, is dedicated to promoting health, well-being and quality of life for people throughout California, across the nation and around the world.
Prevention Institute is an Oakland, California-based nonprofit research, policy, and action center that works nationally to promote prevention, health, and equity by fostering community and policy change so that all people live in healthy, safe environments.