New Data Shows Drug Overdoses Increased in 40 States and Washington, D.C.

Opioids Put Death Rates on Worst Case Scenario Track for the Nation

December 21, 2017

Washington, D.C., December 21, 2017 – In 2016, 63,632 Americans died from drug overdoses, an increase of 21 percent over 2015, according to data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today.  This represents a 50 percent increase over five years and 225 percent increase since 1999.

Trust for America’s Health’s analysis of the data found that:

  • Overdose rates increased in 40 states and Washington, D.C. between 2015 and 2016.
  • Seventeen states had increases of 25 percent or more. The largest increases were in Washington, D.C. (109 percent), Maryland (59 percent) and Florida (46 percent). Rates decreased in nine states.
  • The highest 2016 drug death rates were in West Virginia (52.0 per 100,000 deaths), Ohio (39.1 per 100,000 deaths) and New Hampshire (39.0 per 100,000 deaths).
  • In 2016, 24 states and Washington, D.C. had rates above 20 per 100,000 deaths.  In 2005, no state had a rate above 20 per 100,000 deaths and only five states had rates above 15 per 100,000 deaths.

Around two-thirds of these deaths were opioid-related.  The increase was largely driven by the continued escalation of deaths from fentanyl and other synthetic opioids –topping 19,410 in 2016, up from 9,580 in 2015 and 5,540 in 2014. This is an increase of more than 70 percent for a third year in a row – highlighting the evolving nature of the opioid epidemic, expanding to include more lethal, illicit drugs.  Heroin-related deaths totaled around 15,500 and there were 14,500 prescription painkiller deaths. Death from all other drugs other than fentanyl and other synthetic opioids only rose by 3 percent.

The rapid rise in drug deaths is putting the country on a “worst case” scenario track – where these deaths could reach 163,000 per year by 2025 if recent trends hold, based on projections in a recently released TFAH and Well Being Trust (WBT) report Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol and Suicide Epidemics and the Need for a National Resilience Strategy.  The report calls for a comprehensive, multi-prong approach to respond to the “despair deaths” of drugs, alcohol and suicide – from immediate harm reduction to a long-term strategy to bolster the nation’s resilience.

“The escalating growth of opioid deaths is downright frightening – and it’s getting worse,” said John Auerbach, president and CEO of TFAH. “Every community has been impacted by this crisis and it’s getting lots of headlines, yet we’re not making the investments or taking the actions needed at anywhere near the level needed to turn the tide.”

“These are not simply numbers – these are actual lives. Seeing the loss of life at this dramatic rate calls for more immediate action,” said Benjamin F. Miller, PsyD, Chief Policy Officer, Well Being Trust.  “Our fractured approach to a multi-systemic issue isn’t enough and it isn’t working. We collectively need to take a more comprehensive and systemic approach, beginning with prevention through recovery and treatment, to double down on investing in systems change for real results.”

Additional TFAH Analysis

  • Certain demographics had particularly high rates of drug overdoses in 2016, including: men (26.2 per 100,000) and 35 to 44-year-olds (35.0 per 100,000).
  • Synthetic opioids including fentanyl had the largest increase in the number of deaths between 2015 and 2016 (103 percent increase); heroin and natural and semisynthetic opioids (including most commonly prescribed opioid medications) also increased by 19 percent and 14 percent respectively.
  • Synthetic opioid death rates have been increasing dramatically in the past few years. In 2013, deaths were at 1.0 per 100,000; in 2014, 1.8 per 100,000; in 2015, 3.1 per 100,000; and in 2016, they reached 6.2 per 100,000. This a six-fold increase in three years.

Drug Overdose Deaths, by State

State

2015 Drug Overdose Rate

Deaths per 100,000

2016 Drug Overdose Rate

Deaths per 100,000

2016 Rates, Highest to Lowest

Percent change, 2015-2016

2025 Worst Case Scenario Projections

Deaths per 100,000

Alabama

15.7

16.2

35

3%

45.5

Alaska

16.0

16.8

32

5%

46.9

Arizona

19.0

20.3

25

7%

54.0

Arkansas

13.8

14.0

38

1%

38.9

California

11.3

11.2

45

-1%

35.0

Colorado

15.4

16.6

34

8%

44.6

Connecticut

22.1

27.4

12

24%

62.8

Delaware

22.0

30.8

9

40%

60.0

D.C.

18.6

38.8

4

109%

52.7

Florida

16.2

23.7

17

46%

45.4

Georgia

12.7

13.3

39

5%

36.6

Hawaii

11.3

12.8

40

13%

33.4

Idaho

14.2

15.2

36

7%

36.9

Illinois

14.1

18.9

28

34%

39.7

Indiana

19.5

24.0

16

23%

54.0

Iowa

10.3

10.6

47

3%

29.0

Kansas

11.8

11.1

46

-6%

32.7

Kentucky

29.9

33.5

6

12%

82.1

Louisiana

19.0

21.8

22

15%

52.6

Maine

21.2

28.7

11

35%

57.0

Maryland

20.9

33.2

7

59%

59.9

Massachusetts

25.7

33.0

8

28%

74.3

Michigan

20.4

24.4

15

20%

63.7

Minnesota

10.6

12.5

41

18%

32.4

Mississippi

12.3

12.1

42

-2%

33.6

Missouri

17.9

23.6

18

32%

49.2

Montana

13.8

11.7

44

-15%

40.1

Nebraska

6.9

6.4

51

-7%

20.0

Nevada

20.4

21.7

23

6%

59.4

New Hampshire

34.3

39.0

3

14%

88.7

New Jersey

16.3

23.2

19

42%

45.9

New Mexico

25.3

25.2

13

0%

67.5

New York

13.6

18.0

30

32%

41.5

North Carolina

15.8

19.7

26

25%

44.4

North Dakota

8.6

10.6

48

23%

23.4

Ohio

29.9

39.1

2

31%

80.3

Oklahoma

19.0

21.5

24

13%

52.4

Oregon

12.0

11.9

43

-1%

41.2

Pennsylvania

26.3

37.9

5

44%

71.9

Rhode Island

28.2

30.8

10

9%

82.1

South Carolina

15.7

18.1

29

15%

44.2

South Dakota

8.4

8.4

50

0%

22.9

Tennessee

22.2

24.6

14

11%

63.9

Texas

9.4

10.1

49

7%

27.1

Utah

23.4

22.3

20

-5%

60.7

Vermont

16.7

22.2

21

33%

48.3

Virginia

12.4

16.7

33

35%

34.8

Washington

14.7

14.5

37

-1%

45.2

West Virginia

41.5

52.0

1

25%

110.9

Wisconsin

15.5

19.3

27

25%

42.2

Wyoming

16.4

17.6

31

7%

46.1

Source: National Vital Statistics System, CDC; TFAH, WBT Projections from Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol and Suicide Crises and the Need for a National Resilience Strategy

Notes: The CDC’s National Vital Statistics System data has a separate category for methadone and does not include it in the fentanyl/synthetic opioid category. The state death rates from CDC are age-adjusted. See CDC’s reports Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999–2016 and Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999–2015 for additional data and analysis.

Recommendations from Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol and Suicide Epidemics and the Need for a National Resilience Strategy

Pain in the Nation calls for the creation of a National Resilience Strategy that takes a comprehensive approach by focusing on prevention, early identification of issues and effective treatment. The report highlights more than 60 research-based policies, practices and programs, including:

  • Improve Pain Management and Treatment by helping people heal physically, mentally and emotionally. Approaches must acknowledge that there are different types of pain and experts from mental health, medical care and other disciplines must develop team-based solutions that focus on proactively addressing pain before it gets worse.
  • Stem the Opioid Crisis with a full-scale approach – including promoting responsible opioid prescribing practices (such as provider education and best practices for Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs); public education about misuse and safe disposal of unused drugs; “hotspot” intervention strategies; anti-trafficking to stop the flow of heroin, fentanyl and other illicit drugs; and expanding the use and availability of rescue drugs, sterile syringes and diversion programs.
  • Address the Impact of the Opioid Epidemic on Children – and the Need for a Multi-Generational Response that includes substance use disorder treatment for parents and wrap-around services for children and families, including grandparents and other relatives who help care for children, and expand support for the foster care system. Model programs have been twice as effective in helping mothers achieve sobriety, reduced state custody placement of children by half and had a return on investment of $2.22 for every $1 spent on child welfare programs.
  • Expand and Modernize Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services – Toward a Goal of Focusing on the “Whole Health” of Individuals by prioritizing innovative integrated delivery models for rural and underserved urban areas and expanding the provider workforce, including those who can deliver medication-assisted treatment. Some effective substance use treatment programs have a return of $3.77 per $1 invested.
  • Prioritize Prevention, Reduce Risk Factors and Promote Resilience in Children, Families and Communities by limiting trauma and adverse experiences, which have the biggest long-term impact on later substance misuse, and promoting better mental health. For instance, nurse family home visiting programs have a return of $5.70 for every $1 invested, and early childhood education programs have a $4 to $12 return for every $1 invested.
  • Reboot Substance Misuse Prevention and Mental Health in Schools by scaling up evidence-based life- and coping-skills programs and inclusive school environments and increasing the availability of mental health and other services.

Top school substance misuse prevention programs have a $3.80 to $34 return for every $1 invested; social-emotional learning programs have an $11 for $1 return; and school violence prevention (including suicide) programs have a $15 to $81 for $1 return.

The Pain in the Nation report was supported by grants from WBT and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF).  Data analysis and projections were provided by the Berkeley Research Group.

###

Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority.  Twitter: @HealthyAmerica1

NIH Lifts Ban on Funding High-Risk Virus Research

December 20, 2017
by Brigit Katz
Smithsonian Magazine

But many virologists welcomed the NIH’s lifting of the moratorium. Viruses evolve constantly, and experts say that the another future flu pandemic will definitely happen, according to Fox of NBC News. The U.S. is, however, very poorly equipped to handle an impending epidemic; a recent Trust for America’s Health report found that there are “major gaps in emergency health preparedness” across many states. Being able to predict how a virus will behave, proponents say, can help public health officials better develop strategies for handling a pandemic.

Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/nih-removes-funding-ban-high-risk-virus-research-180967598/#DJtzicjxFPRJ3UPJ.99
Give the gift of Smithsonian magazine for only $12! http://bit.ly/1cGUiGv
Follow us: @SmithsonianMag on Twitter

View the full story (some sites require registration)

NIH lifts limits on making deadly new viruses in the lab

December 19, 2017
by Maggie Fox
NBC News

The report from the Trust for America’s Health found federal and state efforts alike to prepare for disasters such as pandemics, severe weather and attacks have slid backwards, with federal funding cut in half since 2002.

View the full story (some sites require registration)

NIH lifts limits on making deadly new viruses in the lab

December 19, 2017
by Maggie Fox
NBC News

The report from the Trust for America’s Health found federal and state efforts alike to prepare for disasters such as pandemics, severe weather and attacks have slid backwards, with federal funding cut in half since 2002.

View the full story (some sites require registration)

Half of States Scored 5 or Lower Out of 10 Indicators in Report on Health Emergency Preparedness

Report Finds Funding to Support Base Level of Preparedness Cut More than Half Since 2002

 

Washington, D.C., December 19, 2017 – In Ready or Not? Protecting the Public’s Health from Diseases, Disasters and Bioterrorism, 25 states scored a 5 or lower on 10 key indicators of public health preparedness. Alaska scored lowest at 2 out of 10, and Massachusetts and Rhode Island scored the highest at 9 out of 10.

The report, issued today by the Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), found the country does not invest enough to maintain strong, basic core capabilities for health security readiness and, instead, is in a continued state of inefficiently reacting with federal emergency supplemental funding packages each time a disaster strikes.

According to Ready or Not?, federal funding to support the base level of preparedness has been cut by more than half since 2002, which has eroded advancements and reduced the country’s capabilities.

“While we’ve seen great public health preparedness advances, often at the state and community level, progress is continually stilted, halted and uneven,” said John Auerbach, president and CEO of TFAH.  “As a nation, we—year after year—fail to fully support public health and preparedness. If we don’t improve our baseline funding and capabilities, we’ll continue to be caught completely off-guard when hurricanes, wildfires and infectious disease outbreaks hit.”

Ready or Not? features six expert commentaries from public health officials who share perspectives on and experiences from the historic hurricanes, wildfires and other events of 2017, including from California, Florida, Louisiana and Texas.

The report also examines the nation’s ability to respond to public health emergencies, tracks progress and vulnerabilities, and includes a review of state and federal public health preparedness policies. Some key findings include:

  • Just 19 states and Washington, D.C. increased or maintained funding for public health from Fiscal Year (FY) 2015-2016 to FY 2016-2017.
  • The primary source for state and local preparedness for health emergencies has been cut by about one-third (from $940 million in FY 2002 to $667 million in FY 2017) and hospital emergency preparedness funds have been cut in half ($514 million in FY 2003 to $254 million in FY 2017).
  • In 20 states and Washington, D.C. 70 percent or more of hospitals reported meeting Antibiotic Stewardship Program core elements in 2016.
  • Just 20 states vaccinated at least half of their population (ages 6 months and older) for the seasonal flu from Fall 2016 to Spring 2017—and no state was above 56 percent.
  • 47 state labs and Washington, D.C. provided biosafety training and/or provided information about biosafety training courses (July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017).

The Ready or Not? report provides a series of recommendations that address many of the major gaps in emergency health preparedness, including:

  • Communities should maintain a key set of foundational capabilities and focus on performance outcomes in exchange for increased flexibility and reduced bureaucracy.
  • Ensuring stable, sufficient health emergency preparedness funding to maintain a standing set of core capabilities so they are ready when needed. In addition, a complementary Public Health Emergency Fund is needed to provide immediate surge funding for specific action for major emerging threats.
  • Strengthening and maintaining consistent support for global health security as an effective strategy for preventing and controlling health crises. Germs know no borders.
  • Innovating and modernizing infrastructure needs – including a more focused investment strategy to support science and technology upgrades that leverage recent breakthroughs and hold the promise of transforming the nation’s ability to promptly detect and contain disease outbreaks and respond to other health emergencies.
  • Recruiting and training a next generation public health workforce with expert scientific abilities to harness and use technological advances along with critical thinking and management skills to serve as Chief Health Strategist for a community.
  • Reconsidering health system preparedness for new threats and mass outbreaks.  Develop stronger coalitions and partnerships among providers, hospitals and healthcare facilities, insurance providers, pharmaceutical and health equipment businesses, emergency management and public health agencies.
  • Preventing the negative health consequences of climate change and weather-related threats. It is essential to build the capacity to anticipate, plan for and respond to climate-related events.
  • Prioritizing efforts to address one of the most serious threats to human health by expanding efforts to stop superbugs and antibiotic resistance. 
  • Improving rates of vaccinations for children and adults – which are one of the most effective public health tools against many infectious diseases.
  • Supporting a culture of resilience so all communities are better prepared to cope with and recover from emergencies, particularly focusing on those who are most vulnerable.   Sometimes the aftermath of an emergency situation may be more harmful than the initial event.  This must also include support for local organizations and small businesses to prepare for and to respond to emergencies.

The report was supported by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF).

Score Summary: 

A full list of all of the indicators and scores and the full report are available on TFAH’s website.  For the state-by-state scoring, states received one point for achieving an indicator or zero points if they did not achieve the indicator.  Zero is the lowest possible overall score, 10 is the highest.  The data for the indicators are from publicly available sources or were provided from public officials.

9 out of 10: Massachusetts and Rhode Island

8 out of 10: Delaware, North Carolina and Virginia

7 out of 10: Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New York, Oregon and Washington

6 out of 10: California, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Dakota, South Carolina, South Dakota, Utah, Vermont and West Virginia

5 out of 10: Georgia, Idaho, Maine, Mississippi, Montana and Tennessee

4 out of 10: Alabama, Arkansas, Iowa, Louisiana, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma and Pennsylvania

3 out of 10: Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming

2 out of 10: Alaska

 Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority.

 ###

Scientists explore drug’s value in treating both alcoholism and PTSD

November 28, 2017
by Meredith Cohn
Stars & Stripes (Baltimore Sun)

A new report from the Trust for America’s Health counted more than a million deaths tied to alcohol, drugs and suicide in the past decade, with alcohol deaths up 37 percent and suicides increasing 28 percent from 2010 to 2015. The group says it points to an epidemic of pain, despair, disconnection and lack of opportunity and the need for a “national strategy to improve resilience.”

View the full story (some sites require registration)

A national resilience strategy can help prevent deaths from despair

November 28, 2017
by John Auerbach and Benjamin F. Miller
STAT News

Deaths from alcohol, drugs, and suicide occur so often — 1 million in the last decade — that there’s a name for them: deaths from despair. And the situation may get worse. According to a study that the Berkeley Research Group did for our organizations, the Trust for America’s Health and the Well Being Trust, deaths from despair could total 1.6 millionbetween 2016 and 2025, a 60 percent increase over the previous decade. And that might be a conservative estimate.

View the full story (some sites require registration)