TFAH Releases Special Issue Brief: Racial Healing and Achieving Health Equity in the United States

TFAH Calls for Increased Focus on Addressing Health Inequities and Releases Priority Recommendations to Achieve this Goal

Washington, D.C., January 16, 2018 – Today, Trust for America’s Health (TFAH) released Racial Healing and Achieving Health Equity in the United States, which highlights and acknowledges health inequities, the factors that influences them and highlights policy recommendations that can help the nation achieve health equity.

TFAH issued the brief in conjunction with The Truth, Racial Healing & Transformation’s second annual National Day of Racial Healing, which is intended to identify key steps that will help take collective action to promote positive and lasting change across issues.

“As we mark the annual Martin Luther King Day, we are reminded he said that ‘of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most shocking and inhumane’,” said John Auerbach, president and CEO, TFAH. “TFAH is proud to be joining the National Day of Racial Healing to acknowledge health inequities in the country and to focus on building a pathway forward toward an equitable and socially just future.”

TFAH has issued the following set of recommendation to help the nation to achieve health equity:

  • Create strategies to optimize the health of all Americans, regardless of race, ethnicity, income or where they live.  All levels of government must invest in analyzing needs and increasing effective policies and programs to address the systematic inequities that exist and the factors that contribute to these differences, including poverty, income, racism and environmental factors. Solutions should feature community-driven tactics, including using place-based approaches to target programs, policies and support effectively.
  • Expand cross-sector collaborations.  Improving equity in health will require supporting and expanding cross-sector efforts to make communities healthy and safe.  Efforts should engage a wide range of partners, such as schools and businesses, to focus on improving health through better access to high-quality education, jobs, housing, transportation and economic opportunities.
  • Fully fund and implement health equity, health promotion and prevention programs in communities. And, partner with a diverse range of community members to develop and implement health improvement strategies.  Federal, state, local and tribal governments must engage communities in efforts to address both ongoing and critical health threats.  The views, concerns and needs of community stakeholders, such as volunteer organizations, religious organizations and schools and universities, must be taken into account in this process.  Proven, effective programs, such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s REACH (Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health) program should be fully-funded and expanded.
  • Collect data on health and related equity factors – including social determinants of health – by neighborhood.  There should be a priority on improving data collection at a very local level to understand connections between health status and the factors that impact health to help identify concerns and inform the development of strategies to address them.
  • Support Medicaid coverage and reimbursement of clinical-community programs to connect people to services that can help improve health.  Medicaid should reimburse efforts that support improved health beyond the doctor’s office – for example asthma and diabetes prevention programs and other community-based initiatives can help address the root causes that contribute to inequities.
  • Communicate effectively with diverse community groups.  Federal, state, local and tribal officials must design culturally competent, inclusive and linguistically appropriate communication campaigns that use respected, trusted and culturally competent messengers to communicate their message. Communication channels should reflect the media habits of the target audience.
  • Prioritize resiliency in health emergency preparedness efforts.  Federal, state, local and tribal government officials must work with communities and make a concerted effort to address the needs of low-income, minority and other vulnerable groups during health emergencies. Public health leaders must develop and sustain relationships with trusted organizations and stakeholders in diverse communities on an ongoing basis—including working to improve the underlying health of at-risk individuals, sub-population groups and communities, so these relationships are in place before a disaster strikes.  Communication and community engagement must be ongoing to understand the needs of various populations.
  • Eliminate racial and ethnic bias in healthcare.  Policies should incentivize equity and penalize unequal treatment in healthcare, and there should be increased support for programs to increase diversity in and across health professions.  In addition, efforts should be increased to train more healthcare professionals from under-represented populations so that the workforce reflects the diversity of the patient population.
  • Incorporate strategies that foster community agency—or a community’s collective ability and opportunity to make purposeful choices—into the design, implementation and governance of multi-sector collaborations. Building community agency can contribute to improved community health by yielding a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities influencing a community, and relies on an asset-based approach to leverage existing community strengths and resources. Multi-sector collaborations should include dedicated resources for fostering and measuring community agency. Efforts should maximize and bolster community voice and power as a means to influencing larger policy- and systems-level changes (including those within and outside of the traditional health sector).

###

Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority.  Twitter: @HealthyAmerica1

America is so out of shape, it’s putting U.S. army soldiers in danger

January 11, 2018
by JOHN HALTIWANGER
Newsweek

The South has some of the highest obesity rates in the country. Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama all have adult obesity rates about 35 percent, placing them among the top 5 most obese states in the U.S. (West Virginia has the highest rate of adult obesity, at 37.7 percent), according to the State of Obesity, an annual report from non-profit Trust for America’s Health and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

View the full story (some sites require registration)

2018 Outlook: What healthcare industry insiders are watching in the year ahead

December 30, 2017
by Steven Ross Johnson
Modern Healthcare

John Auerbach | CEO
TRUST FOR AMERICA’S HEALTH

The first issue I would suggest is the potential for either a repeal or significant weakening of the Affordable Care Act. From a public health perspective, the prospect of potentially millions of people losing their insurance is very significant. We know that access to healthcare is correlated to better health. Historically, the public health sector has been a safety net by providing vaccines, treatment for infectious disease, reproductive health services. Those safety-net services have dramatically decreased as more people have gotten insurance. If millions of people lose their coverage, the prior safety net no longer exists in the way that it did. Public health will have to figure out how to address that.

View the full story (some sites require registration)

Infectious Disease Roundup 2017 — The Year In Review

December 28, 2017
by Judy Stone
Forbes

The Trust for America’s Health also explained the importance of the Prevention Fund, including strict performance measures for grants. More than 500 signatories—ranging from the TFAH and public health organizations to patient advocacy groups, universities and local health departments sent a letter imploring Trump not to gut this essential program.

View the full story (some sites require registration)

Leading Public Health Groups: Using the Prevention Fund to help fund CHIP: A Serious Mistake

Statement from Trust for America’s Health, American Public Health Association, National Association of County and City Health Officials, Prevention Institute, and Public Health Institute

December 22, 2017

Washington, D.C., December 22, 2017 –It is a serious mistake to cut $750 million from the Prevention and Public Health Fund to provide very short-term funding for the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) and community health centers. The below is a statement from the American Public Health Association, National Association of County and City Health Officials, Prevention Institute, Public Health Institute, and Trust for America’s Health:

“The Prevention Fund supports critical public health activities—including lead poisoning surveillance, vaccination initiatives and other programs—in every state and community across the country. Cutting this significant funding source would leave communities without the vital resources needed to keep children and families happy, healthy and safe.

It is even more alarming and contradictory that this cut will be used to provide very short-term funding for CHIP and community health centers. Our organizations are united in support of CHIP and community health centers, which are vital to improving children’s health. But losing the Prevention Fund would just create another hole in the public health support children need.

The Prevention Fund is supported strongly by national, state and local groups alike—indeed to-date 1,142 have joined the Prevention Fund supporter’s list. They know the value of the $630 million annually that goes directly to states and communities to prevent illness and disease.

A strong public health system makes the difference between health and illness, safety and injury, life and death.

We urge Congress to oppose any and all future cuts to the Prevention Fund and to begin the long-overdue process of increasing support to CHIP, community health centers, CDC and other public health agencies so today’s children can be our healthiest and happiest generation.”

John Auerbach, President & CEO, Trust for America’s Health

Georges C. Benjamin, MD, Executive Director, American Public Health Association

Larry Cohen, Executive Director, Prevention Institute

Laura Hanen, MPP, Interim Executive Director and Chief of Government Affairs, National Association of County and City Health Officials

Mary A. Pittman, President & CEO, Public Health Institute

###

Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority. www.healthyamericans.org

The American Public Health Association champions the health of all people and all communities. We strengthen the public health profession. We speak out for public health issues and policies backed by science. We are the only organization that combines a 145-year perspective, a broad-based member community and the ability to influence federal policy to improve the public’s health. Visit us at www.apha.org.

The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) represents the nation’s nearly 3,000 local governmental health departments. These city, county, metropolitan, district, and tribal departments work every day to protect and promote health and well-being for all people in their communities. For more information about NACCHO, please visit www.naccho.org.

The Public Health Institute, an independent nonprofit organization, is dedicated to promoting health, well-being and quality of life for people throughout California, across the nation and around the world.

Prevention Institute is an Oakland, California-based nonprofit research, policy, and action center that works nationally to promote prevention, health, and equity by fostering community and policy change so that all people live in healthy, safe environments.

These States Are Best Prepared for Public Health Emergencies

December 21, 2017
by Gaby Galvin
U.S. News & World Report

But federal funding for basic preparedness has been slashed by more than half since 2002, according to a report from Trust for America’s Health, a health policy nonprofit based in the nation’s capital. The report measured each state on 10 measures of emergency health preparedness for disasters, diseases and bioterrorism. Half of the states scored a 5 or lower, with Massachusetts and Rhode Island meeting the most measures and Alaska meeting the least.

View the full story (some sites require registration)

New Data Shows Drug Overdoses Increased in 40 States and Washington, D.C.

Opioids Put Death Rates on Worst Case Scenario Track for the Nation

December 21, 2017

Washington, D.C., December 21, 2017 – In 2016, 63,632 Americans died from drug overdoses, an increase of 21 percent over 2015, according to data released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) today.  This represents a 50 percent increase over five years and 225 percent increase since 1999.

Trust for America’s Health’s analysis of the data found that:

  • Overdose rates increased in 40 states and Washington, D.C. between 2015 and 2016.
  • Seventeen states had increases of 25 percent or more. The largest increases were in Washington, D.C. (109 percent), Maryland (59 percent) and Florida (46 percent). Rates decreased in nine states.
  • The highest 2016 drug death rates were in West Virginia (52.0 per 100,000 deaths), Ohio (39.1 per 100,000 deaths) and New Hampshire (39.0 per 100,000 deaths).
  • In 2016, 24 states and Washington, D.C. had rates above 20 per 100,000 deaths.  In 2005, no state had a rate above 20 per 100,000 deaths and only five states had rates above 15 per 100,000 deaths.

Around two-thirds of these deaths were opioid-related.  The increase was largely driven by the continued escalation of deaths from fentanyl and other synthetic opioids –topping 19,410 in 2016, up from 9,580 in 2015 and 5,540 in 2014. This is an increase of more than 70 percent for a third year in a row – highlighting the evolving nature of the opioid epidemic, expanding to include more lethal, illicit drugs.  Heroin-related deaths totaled around 15,500 and there were 14,500 prescription painkiller deaths. Death from all other drugs other than fentanyl and other synthetic opioids only rose by 3 percent.

The rapid rise in drug deaths is putting the country on a “worst case” scenario track – where these deaths could reach 163,000 per year by 2025 if recent trends hold, based on projections in a recently released TFAH and Well Being Trust (WBT) report Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol and Suicide Epidemics and the Need for a National Resilience Strategy.  The report calls for a comprehensive, multi-prong approach to respond to the “despair deaths” of drugs, alcohol and suicide – from immediate harm reduction to a long-term strategy to bolster the nation’s resilience.

“The escalating growth of opioid deaths is downright frightening – and it’s getting worse,” said John Auerbach, president and CEO of TFAH. “Every community has been impacted by this crisis and it’s getting lots of headlines, yet we’re not making the investments or taking the actions needed at anywhere near the level needed to turn the tide.”

“These are not simply numbers – these are actual lives. Seeing the loss of life at this dramatic rate calls for more immediate action,” said Benjamin F. Miller, PsyD, Chief Policy Officer, Well Being Trust.  “Our fractured approach to a multi-systemic issue isn’t enough and it isn’t working. We collectively need to take a more comprehensive and systemic approach, beginning with prevention through recovery and treatment, to double down on investing in systems change for real results.”

Additional TFAH Analysis

  • Certain demographics had particularly high rates of drug overdoses in 2016, including: men (26.2 per 100,000) and 35 to 44-year-olds (35.0 per 100,000).
  • Synthetic opioids including fentanyl had the largest increase in the number of deaths between 2015 and 2016 (103 percent increase); heroin and natural and semisynthetic opioids (including most commonly prescribed opioid medications) also increased by 19 percent and 14 percent respectively.
  • Synthetic opioid death rates have been increasing dramatically in the past few years. In 2013, deaths were at 1.0 per 100,000; in 2014, 1.8 per 100,000; in 2015, 3.1 per 100,000; and in 2016, they reached 6.2 per 100,000. This a six-fold increase in three years.

Drug Overdose Deaths, by State

State

2015 Drug Overdose Rate

Deaths per 100,000

2016 Drug Overdose Rate

Deaths per 100,000

2016 Rates, Highest to Lowest

Percent change, 2015-2016

2025 Worst Case Scenario Projections

Deaths per 100,000

Alabama

15.7

16.2

35

3%

45.5

Alaska

16.0

16.8

32

5%

46.9

Arizona

19.0

20.3

25

7%

54.0

Arkansas

13.8

14.0

38

1%

38.9

California

11.3

11.2

45

-1%

35.0

Colorado

15.4

16.6

34

8%

44.6

Connecticut

22.1

27.4

12

24%

62.8

Delaware

22.0

30.8

9

40%

60.0

D.C.

18.6

38.8

4

109%

52.7

Florida

16.2

23.7

17

46%

45.4

Georgia

12.7

13.3

39

5%

36.6

Hawaii

11.3

12.8

40

13%

33.4

Idaho

14.2

15.2

36

7%

36.9

Illinois

14.1

18.9

28

34%

39.7

Indiana

19.5

24.0

16

23%

54.0

Iowa

10.3

10.6

47

3%

29.0

Kansas

11.8

11.1

46

-6%

32.7

Kentucky

29.9

33.5

6

12%

82.1

Louisiana

19.0

21.8

22

15%

52.6

Maine

21.2

28.7

11

35%

57.0

Maryland

20.9

33.2

7

59%

59.9

Massachusetts

25.7

33.0

8

28%

74.3

Michigan

20.4

24.4

15

20%

63.7

Minnesota

10.6

12.5

41

18%

32.4

Mississippi

12.3

12.1

42

-2%

33.6

Missouri

17.9

23.6

18

32%

49.2

Montana

13.8

11.7

44

-15%

40.1

Nebraska

6.9

6.4

51

-7%

20.0

Nevada

20.4

21.7

23

6%

59.4

New Hampshire

34.3

39.0

3

14%

88.7

New Jersey

16.3

23.2

19

42%

45.9

New Mexico

25.3

25.2

13

0%

67.5

New York

13.6

18.0

30

32%

41.5

North Carolina

15.8

19.7

26

25%

44.4

North Dakota

8.6

10.6

48

23%

23.4

Ohio

29.9

39.1

2

31%

80.3

Oklahoma

19.0

21.5

24

13%

52.4

Oregon

12.0

11.9

43

-1%

41.2

Pennsylvania

26.3

37.9

5

44%

71.9

Rhode Island

28.2

30.8

10

9%

82.1

South Carolina

15.7

18.1

29

15%

44.2

South Dakota

8.4

8.4

50

0%

22.9

Tennessee

22.2

24.6

14

11%

63.9

Texas

9.4

10.1

49

7%

27.1

Utah

23.4

22.3

20

-5%

60.7

Vermont

16.7

22.2

21

33%

48.3

Virginia

12.4

16.7

33

35%

34.8

Washington

14.7

14.5

37

-1%

45.2

West Virginia

41.5

52.0

1

25%

110.9

Wisconsin

15.5

19.3

27

25%

42.2

Wyoming

16.4

17.6

31

7%

46.1

Source: National Vital Statistics System, CDC; TFAH, WBT Projections from Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol and Suicide Crises and the Need for a National Resilience Strategy

Notes: The CDC’s National Vital Statistics System data has a separate category for methadone and does not include it in the fentanyl/synthetic opioid category. The state death rates from CDC are age-adjusted. See CDC’s reports Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999–2016 and Drug Overdose Deaths in the United States, 1999–2015 for additional data and analysis.

Recommendations from Pain in the Nation: The Drug, Alcohol and Suicide Epidemics and the Need for a National Resilience Strategy

Pain in the Nation calls for the creation of a National Resilience Strategy that takes a comprehensive approach by focusing on prevention, early identification of issues and effective treatment. The report highlights more than 60 research-based policies, practices and programs, including:

  • Improve Pain Management and Treatment by helping people heal physically, mentally and emotionally. Approaches must acknowledge that there are different types of pain and experts from mental health, medical care and other disciplines must develop team-based solutions that focus on proactively addressing pain before it gets worse.
  • Stem the Opioid Crisis with a full-scale approach – including promoting responsible opioid prescribing practices (such as provider education and best practices for Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs); public education about misuse and safe disposal of unused drugs; “hotspot” intervention strategies; anti-trafficking to stop the flow of heroin, fentanyl and other illicit drugs; and expanding the use and availability of rescue drugs, sterile syringes and diversion programs.
  • Address the Impact of the Opioid Epidemic on Children – and the Need for a Multi-Generational Response that includes substance use disorder treatment for parents and wrap-around services for children and families, including grandparents and other relatives who help care for children, and expand support for the foster care system. Model programs have been twice as effective in helping mothers achieve sobriety, reduced state custody placement of children by half and had a return on investment of $2.22 for every $1 spent on child welfare programs.
  • Expand and Modernize Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services – Toward a Goal of Focusing on the “Whole Health” of Individuals by prioritizing innovative integrated delivery models for rural and underserved urban areas and expanding the provider workforce, including those who can deliver medication-assisted treatment. Some effective substance use treatment programs have a return of $3.77 per $1 invested.
  • Prioritize Prevention, Reduce Risk Factors and Promote Resilience in Children, Families and Communities by limiting trauma and adverse experiences, which have the biggest long-term impact on later substance misuse, and promoting better mental health. For instance, nurse family home visiting programs have a return of $5.70 for every $1 invested, and early childhood education programs have a $4 to $12 return for every $1 invested.
  • Reboot Substance Misuse Prevention and Mental Health in Schools by scaling up evidence-based life- and coping-skills programs and inclusive school environments and increasing the availability of mental health and other services.

Top school substance misuse prevention programs have a $3.80 to $34 return for every $1 invested; social-emotional learning programs have an $11 for $1 return; and school violence prevention (including suicide) programs have a $15 to $81 for $1 return.

The Pain in the Nation report was supported by grants from WBT and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF).  Data analysis and projections were provided by the Berkeley Research Group.

###

Trust for America’s Health is a non-profit, non-partisan organization dedicated to saving lives by protecting the health of every community and working to make disease prevention a national priority.  Twitter: @HealthyAmerica1