Archives: Press Releases

Press Release on health-related topics.

TFAH Applauds the Introduction of The Improving Social Determinants of Health Act of 2020 by Representative Nanette Diaz Barragán (CA-44)

(Washington, DC – April 21) – Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), a non-partisan, independent public health policy, research and advocacy organization, applauds the introduction of the Improving Social Determinants of Health Act of 2020  for the critical ways it would address the social, economic and environmental conditions that affect health and wellbeing and drive improved health for millions of Americans.

If enacted, the bill would create a Social Determinants of Health (SDOH) Program at the   Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Through grants, this program would improve the capacity of public health departments and community organizations to address social determinants of health and reduce health care costs by building multi-sector collaborations and addressing policies that currently inhibit good health. Grants would also be issued to nonprofit organizations and institutions of higher education to conduct research on SDOH best practices, provide technical, training and evaluation assistance and/or disseminate those best practices. Lastly, the program would coordinate, support and align SDOH activities at CDC.

The President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health, John Auerbach, congratulates Rep. Barragán on the introduction of the bill:

“Now more than ever it is important to address the social and economic conditions, including housing, employment, food security, and education, that contribute significantly to an individual’s health outcomes over their lifetime.

The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted how a community’s resources directly impact the health of its residents. People at a disproportionate risk for serious health impacts from the novel coronavirus are also more likely to suffer secondary consequences, such as loss of income or health care, as a result of the pandemic.

TFAH believes this legislation is an important step to addressing the non-medical social needs of communities and urges Congressional support. The legislation would empower public health departments and community organizations to act as chief health strategists in their communities and lead efforts to convene partners across sectors to build integrated systems and programs that improve health and health equity.

The Improving Social Determinants of Health Act of 2020 is an important next step in improving health outcomes, would reduce overall healthcare spending and help address health inequities; TFAH is proud to support this bill.”

In addition to TFAH, original endorsing national organizations include:

1,000 Days, The AIDS Institute, Aligning for Health, American Association of Birth Centers, American Association on Health and Disability, American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American College of Preventive Medicine, American Federation of Teachers, American Heart Association, American Kidney Fund, American Medical Student Association, American Public Health Association, Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum, Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs, Association of Minority Health Professions Schools, Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Autistic Self Advocacy Network, ChangeLab Solutions, Coalition for Disability Health Equity, Common Threads, Community Catalyst, Community Cup Classic Foundation, Congregation of Our Lady of the Good Shepherd, U.S. Provinces, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF), Disabled Sports USA, Epilepsy Alliance America, Families USA, Health Leadership Legacy Project, Health Resources in Action, Healthy Kinder International, Hispanic Federation, Japanese American Citizens League, Lakeshore Foundation, Lutheran Services in America, March of Dimes, NAACP, NASTAD, National Advocacy Center of the Sisters of the Good Shepherd, National Association of Certified Professional Midwives, National Association of Counties, National Association of County and City Health Officials, National Association of School Nurses, National Association of Social Workers, National Center for Transgender Equality, National Center for Transgender Equality, National Health Care for the Homeless Council, National Medical Association (NMA), National Network of Public Health Institutes, National Nurse-Led Care Consortium, National REACH Coalition, National WIC Association, National Working Positive Coalition, NERDS RULE INC, Network for Environmental & Economic Responsibility, NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice, Participatory Budgeting Project, PFLAG National, Population Health Alliance, Praxis Project, Prevention Institute, Public Health Foundation, RESULTS, Society for Public Health Education, Southeast Asia Resource Action Center (SEARAC), Treatment Action Group, WE in the World, Well Being Trust, and Wholesome Wave.

TFAH’s summary of the bill can be found here.   For more information on The Improving Social Determinants of Health Act of 2020, please contact Daphne Delgado at [email protected].

 

 

Nuevo informe muestra que la respuesta de COVID-19 fue años de fabricación

El financiamiento para los programas de preparación y respuesta de salud pública perdió terreno en el año fiscal 2020 y durante la última década

(Washington, DC – 16 de abril de 2020) – La falta de fondos crónica de los sistemas de preparación para emergencias y salud pública del país ha hecho que el país sea vulnerable a los riesgos de seguridad de la salud, incluida la nueva pandemia de coronavirus, según un nuevo informe publicado hoy por Trust for America’s Health.

El informe, El impacto de la falta de fondos crónica en el sistema de salud pública de Estados Unidos: Tendencias, riesgos y recomendaciones, 2020, examina las tendencias federales, estatales y locales de financiamiento de salud pública y recomienda inversiones y acciones políticas para construir un sistema más sólido, priorizar la prevención y efectivamente abordar los riesgos para la salud del siglo XXI.

“COVID-19 ha puesto de relieve la dura falta de preparación del país para hacer frente a las amenazas al bienestar de los estadounidenses”, dijo John Auerbach, presidente y CEO de Trust for America’s Health. “Años de recortar fondos para programas de salud pública y preparación para emergencias han dejado a la nación con una fuerza laboral de salud pública más pequeña de lo necesario, capacidad de prueba limitada, una reserva nacional insuficiente y sistemas de seguimiento de enfermedades arcaicas – en resumen, herramientas del siglo XX para lidiando con los desafíos del siglo XXI “.

Imagen mixta para la financiación de los CDC para el año fiscal 2020

Los Centros para el Control y la Prevención de Enfermedades (CDC) de los Estados Unidos. Son la agencia de salud pública líder del país. El presupuesto general de los CDC para el año fiscal 2020 es de $ 7.92 mil millones: un aumento de $ 645 millones, 9 por ciento sobre el financiamiento de los CDC para el año fiscal 2019, 7 por ciento en dólares ajustados por inflación. El mayor aumento del año fiscal 2020 fue una inversión única en edificios e instalaciones (+ $ 225 millones). Otros aumentos incluyeron fondos para la iniciativa Ending HIV (+ $ 140 millones) y pequeños aumentos para programas de prevención de suicidio y enfermedades crónicas.

Financiamiento de preparación para emergencias este año y por más de una década

Los fondos para los programas de preparación y respuesta de salud pública de los CDC disminuyeron entre los presupuestos del año fiscal 2019 y el año fiscal 2020, de $ 858 millones en el año fiscal 2019 a $ 850 millones en el año fiscal 2020. Los fondos del programa de los CDC para la preparación para emergencias en el año fiscal 2020 ($ 7.92 mil millones) son menores que fue en el año fiscal 2011 ($ 7.99 mil millones en dólares del año fiscal 2020), después de ajustar por inflación.

Los fondos para los programas de preparación y respuesta ante emergencias de salud pública estatales y locales también se han reducido, en aproximadamente un tercio desde 2003. Y, de gran preocupación ahora, los fondos para el Programa de Preparación Hospitalaria, la única fuente federal de fondos para ayudar a la prestación de atención médica. El sistema de preparación y respuesta ante emergencias se ha reducido a la mitad desde 2003.

La acción federal para promulgar tres paquetes de fondos suplementarios para apoyar la respuesta a la pandemia COVID-19 fue crítica. Pero son ajustes a corto plazo que no fortalecen la capacidad central a largo plazo del sistema de salud pública, según los autores del informe. Se necesitan incrementos sostenidos de fondos anuales para garantizar que nuestros sistemas de seguridad de salud e infraestructura de salud pública estén a la altura de la tarea de proteger a todas las comunidades.

El descuido habitual de la salud pública en la nación, excepto durante emergencias, es un problema de larga data. “Las emergencias que amenazan la salud y el bienestar de los estadounidenses son cada vez más frecuentes y más graves. Estos incluyen incendios forestales e inundaciones, la crisis de opioides, el aumento de la obesidad y las enfermedades crónicas, y este año un brote de sarampión, lesiones pulmonares graves debido al vapeo y la peor pandemia en un siglo. Debemos comenzar a hacer inversiones año tras año en salud pública”, dijo Auerbach.

Además de apoyar las actividades federales, los fondos federales también son la fuente principal de financiamiento para la mayoría de los programas de salud pública locales y estatales. Durante el año fiscal 2018, el 55 por ciento de los gastos de salud pública de los estados, en promedio, fueron financiados por fuentes federales. Por lo tanto, los recortes en el gasto federal tienen un grave efecto de goteo en los programas estatales y locales. Entre el año fiscal 2016 y el año fiscal 2018, los gastos estatales de dinero federal para actividades de salud pública disminuyeron de $ 16.3 mil millones a $ 12.8 mil millones. Además de los recortes federales, algunos estados también han reducido los fondos de salud pública. Más del 20 por ciento de los estados (once) recortaron sus fondos de salud pública entre 2018 y 2019.

Estos recortes de fondos han llevado a reducciones significativas de la fuerza laboral en los departamentos de salud pública estatales y locales. En el 2017, el 51 por ciento de los grandes departamentos locales de salud pública informaron pérdidas de empleos. Algunas de las posiciones pérdidas fueron en el personal de salud pública de primera línea que habría sido movilizado para combatir la pandemia de COVID-19.

El informe incluye 28 recomendaciones de políticas para mejorar la preparación para emergencias del país en cuatro áreas prioritarias:

  • mayor financiamiento para fortalecer la infraestructura de salud pública y la fuerza laboral, incluida la modernización de los sistemas de datos y las capacidades de vigilancia.
  • mejorar la preparación para emergencias, incluida la preparación para eventos relacionados con el clima y brotes de enfermedades infecciosas.
  • salvaguardar y mejorar la salud de los estadounidenses invirtiendo en la prevención de enfermedades crónicas y la prevención del abuso de sustancias y el suicidio.
  • abordar los determinantes sociales de la salud y avanzar en la equidad en salud.

El informe también respalda el llamado de más de 100 organizaciones de salud pública para que el Congreso aumente el presupuesto de los CDC en un 22 por ciento para el año fiscal 2022.

 

# # #

Trust for America’s Health es una organización sin fines de lucro y no partidista que promueve la salud óptima para cada persona y comunidad y hace de la prevención de enfermedades y lesiones una prioridad nacional. Twitter: @healthyamerica1

New Report Shows Hamstrung COVID-19 Response was Years in the Making

Funding for public health preparedness and response programs lost ground in FY 2020 and over the past decade.

(Washington, DC – April 16, 2020) – Chronic underfunding of the nation’s public health and emergency preparedness systems has made the nation vulnerable to health security risks, including the novel coronavirus pandemic, according to a new report released today by Trust for America’s Health.

The report, The Impact of Chronic Underfunding on America’s Public Health System: Trends, Risks, and Recommendations, 2020, examines federal, state, and local public health funding trends and recommends investments and policy actions to build a stronger system, prioritize prevention, and effectively address twenty-first-century health risks.

“COVID-19 has shined a harsh spotlight on the country’s lack of preparedness for dealing with threats to Americans’ well-being,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health. “Years of cutting funding for public health and emergency preparedness programs has left the nation with a smaller-than-necessary public health workforce, limited testing capacity, an insufficient national stockpile, and archaic disease tracking systems – in summary, twentieth-century tools for dealing with twenty-first-century challenges.”

Mixed Picture for CDC FY 2020 Funding

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is the nation’s leading public health agency. The CDC’s overall budget for FY 2020 is $7.92 billion – a $645 million increase, 9 percent over FY 2019 CDC funding, 7 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars. The largest FY 2020 increase was a onetime investment in buildings and facilities (+$225 million). Other increases included funding for the Ending HIV initiative (+$140 million) and small increases for suicide and chronic disease prevention programs.

Emergency Preparedness Funding Down This Year and For Over a Decade

Funding for CDC’s public health preparedness and response programs decreased between the FY 2019 and FY 2020 budgets – down from $858 million in FY 2019 to $850 million in FY 2020.  CDC’s program funding for emergency preparedness in FY 2020 ($7.92 billion) is less than it was in FY 2011 ($7.99 billion in FY 2020 dollars), after adjusting for inflation.

Funding for state and local public health emergency preparedness and response programs has also been reduced, by approximately one-third since 2003. And, of critical concern now, funding for the Hospital Preparedness Program, the only federal source of funding to help the healthcare delivery system prepare for and respond to emergencies, has been cut by half since 2003.

Federal action to enact three supplemental funding packages to support the COVID-19 pandemic response was critical. But they are short-term adjustments that do not strengthen the core, long-term capacity of the public health system, according to the report’s authors.  Sustained annual funding increases are needed to ensure that our health security systems and public health infrastructure are up to the task of protecting all communities.

The nation’s habitual neglect of public health, except during emergencies, is a longstanding problem. “Emergencies that threaten Americans’ health and well-being are becoming more frequent and more severe. These include wildfires and flooding, the opioid crisis, the increase in obesity and chronic illness, and this year a measles outbreak, serious lung injuries due to vaping, and the worst pandemic in a century. We must begin making year-in and year-out investments in public health,” Auerbach said.

In addition to supporting federal activities, federal monies are also the primary source of funding for most state and local public health programs. During FY 2018, 55 percent of states’ public health expenditures, on average, were funded from federal sources. Therefore, federal spending cuts have a serious trickle-down effect on state and local programs. Between FY 2016 and FY 2018, state expenditures of federal monies for public health activities decreased from $16.3 billion to $12.8 billion.   On top of federal cuts, some states have also reduced public health funding.  More than 20 percent of states (eleven) cut their public health funding between 2018 and 2019.

These funding cuts have led to significant workforce reductions in state and local public health departments. In 2017, 51 percent of large local public health departments reported job losses.  Some of the positions lost were frontline public health staff who would have been mobilized to combat the COVID-19 pandemic.

The report includes 28 policy recommendations to improve the country’s emergency preparedness in four priority areas:

  • increased funding to strengthen the public health infrastructure and workforce, including modernizing data systems and surveillance capacities.
  • improving emergency preparedness, including preparation for weather-related events and infectious disease outbreaks.
  • safeguarding and improving Americans’ health by investing in chronic disease prevention and the prevention of substance misuse and suicide.
  • addressing the social determinants of health and advancing health equity.

The report also endorses the call by more than 100 public health organizations for Congress to increase CDC’s budget by 22 percent by FY 2022.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. Twitter: @healthyamerica1

Trust for America’s Health Statement in Response to Congressional Passage of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”)

March 27, 2020

“Congress took an important step today to begin giving public health the resources it needs now to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. We are seeing in real-time the impact of the chipping away at public health budgets over the past 15 years. Health departments are facing unprecedented crises, and in many cases are doing so with a reduced workforce and 20th-century technologies.

The bill invests $4.3 billion in CDC, state and local public health to carry out critical response activities. It includes funding for state, local, tribal and territorial public health departments, global health security, and modernizing public health’s outdated data systems. We applaud Congress for allowing these funds to be spent over five years due to the increasing number and complexity of the nation’s public health challenges. The legislation includes funding for the Hospital Preparedness Program, a program that has seen its funding cut in half since 2003. It funds the development and purchase of vaccines and other critical needs.

Supplemental funding is critical during an emergency but cannot make up for long-standing, chronic underfunding of the public health system. We urgently need to rebuild and modernize the nation’s public health infrastructure and workforce. A significant, long-term commitment to public health infrastructure and programs is needed to prepare for the next pandemic and build a healthier, more resilient population. We need to strengthen the vaccine infrastructure, which will need to successfully and quickly distribute an eventual vaccine. We need to prevent and treat mental health issues and substance misuse, resolve health inequities and address the social determinants of health. The battle has begun.”

John Auerbach, President and CEO
Trust for America’s Health

10th Anniversary of the ACA: A Time to Reflect on its Impact and Refocus Efforts on the Act’s Purpose and Goals

COVID-19 has shown how important it is to fully fund the ACA created Prevention and Public Health Fund

March 23, 2020

This tenth anniversary of the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) is an appropriate time to measure its impact and recommit to its purpose.  Prior to the ACA, more than 44 million non-elderly adults were uninsured. By 2016, that rate of uninsured people reached a historic low as approximately 20 million Americans gained access to health insurance coverage under the ACA including 12 million adults who gained coverage due to Medicaid expansion.[1]

The ACA was transformative legislation in at least three ways. It offered Americans access to medical care when they were acutely ill and when they needed ongoing treatment for a chronic condition (78 percent of U.S. adults 55 and older have at least one chronic condition[2]). In addition, millions of Americans gained access to preventive care such as vaccinations and health screenings.   Thirdly, it helped advance health equity by narrowing – although not eliminating – the gaps in access to high-quality care experienced by people of color due to economic disadvantage and systemic discrimination.

Prior to the ACA, Black Americans were 70 percent more likely to be uninsured than Whites and the uninsured rate for Latinos was nearly three times the uninsured rate for Whites[3]. After the ACA became law, Latinos had the largest decrease in uninsurance rates, falling from 32.6 percent to 19.1 percent between 2010 and 2016. Uninsurance rates also fell by 8 percent for Asian Americans and Black Americans during the same period.[4]

Medicaid expansion states experienced significant coverage gains and reductions in uninsured rates among low-income individuals and within specific vulnerable populations.[5] A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research found that Medicaid expansion is associated with reduced mortality.[6]  According to the study, states that expanded Medicaid had an estimated 19,200 fewer adult deaths (ages 55 to 64) between 2014 and 2017 than did states that did not expand Medicaid.[7]

Furthermore, the ACA created the Prevention and Public Health Fund (PPHF) and allocated $2 billion annually as an “expanded and sustained national investment in prevention and public health programs”. Unfortunately, much of the PPHF funding has been reallocated to other programs outside prevention and public health. On this 10th anniversary of the passage of the ACA, Congress should redouble its efforts to ensure the Prevention Fund is fully funded and that those funds are directed as intended, to prevention and public health programs.

As the COVID-19 pandemic has put in the spotlight, individual health is often linked to community health. The Prevention and Public Health Fund’s intended purpose and emphasis: sustained investment in the nation’s public health infrastructure would, if fully realized, strengthen our national readiness for health emergencies. A level of readiness that the COVID-19 pandemic has shown to be seriously inadequate.

While this 10th anniversary of the Affordable Care Act is a time to recognize and applaud its significant impact, it is also a time to shine a spotlight on the fact that over 27 million Americans remain without access to healthcare due to being uninsured.  Ensuring that all Americans have access to healthcare is a priority of Trust for America’s Health and must be a national priority.

 

[1] Garfield R, Orgera K, Damico A. The uninsured and the ACA: a primer—key facts about health insurance and the uninsured amidst changes to the Affordable Care Act [Internet]. San Francisco (CA): Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019 Jan 25.  https://www.kff.org/uninsured/report/the-uninsured-and-the-aca-a-primer-key-facts-about-health-insurance-and-the-uninsured-amidst-changes-to-the-affordable-care-act/ Google Scholar

[2] CDC, National Center for Health Statistics. Percentage of U.S. Adults over 55 with Chronic Conditions. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/health_policy/adult_chronic_conditions.htm

[3] Buchmueller TC, Levinson ZM, Levy HG, Wolfe BL. Effect of the Affordable Care Act on racial and ethnic disparities in health insurance coverage. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(8):1416–21

[4] Garfield R, Orgera K, Damico A. The uninsured and the ACA: a primer—key facts about health insurance and the uninsured amidst changes to the Affordable Care Act [Internet]. San Francisco (CA): Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2019 Jan 25.  https://www.kff.org/uninsured/report/the-uninsured-and-the-aca-a-primer-key-facts-about-health-insurance-and-the-uninsured-amidst-changes-to-the-affordable-care-act/

[5] Madeline Guth, et al. The Effects of Medicaid Expansion Under the ACA: Updated Findings from a Literature Review. March 17, 2020.

[6] Sarah Miller et al., “Medicaid and Mortality: New Evidence from Linked Survey and Administrative Data,” National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, August 2019, https://www.nber.org/papers/w26081.

[7] Ibid

Cross-Sector Group of Eighty-eight Organizations Calls on Congress to Address Americans’ Mental Health and Substance Misuse Treatment Needs as Part of COVID-19 Response

Nation must prepare for immediate and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on the nation’s mental health

(Washington, DC – March 20, 2020) — A cross-sector group of 88 organizations from the mental health and substance misuse, public health and patient-advocacy sectors are jointly calling on the Trump Administration and Congress to address the immediate and long term mental health and substance misuse treatment needs of all Americans as part of their COVID-19 response. Such consideration is especially important as the anxiety and social isolation related to the COVID-19 pandemic are likely to increase the need for mental health and substance misuse care, according to the group’s leaders.

In a letter sent to Vice President Pence and House and Senate leadership today, the group recognizes the importance of social distancing but also cites the need to proactively address the short and long-term impacts of social isolation on Americans’ mental health. Of particular concern are those people who are currently being treated for a mental health or substance misuse issue, treatment that may be interrupted by illness, stay-at-home orders, business shut-downs or the loss of income or health insurance.

Access to mental health and substance misuse treatment is an ongoing concern, likely to be exacerbated by the COVID-19 crisis. Currently, 112 million Americans live in a mental health professional shortage area. Furthermore, loneliness and social isolation are already a daily reality for many Americans and is estimated to shorten a person’s life by 15 years – the equivalent impact of having obesity or smoking 15 cigarettes a day. This problem will only increase as further social distancing requirements are put in place.

The cross-sector group is calling for immediate action to address Americans’ mental health and substance misuse needs during the COVID-19 response. And, for the longer term, strengthening the nation’s mental health and substance misuse treatment system so it meets the needs of all Americans, regardless of their socioeconomic status, their employment status or where they live.

The group is following for the following action steps: The Administration and/or Congress should:

Immediately implement measures to ensure access and continuation of mental health and substance use services to all individuals during the COVID-19 response and during future public health emergencies including:

  • HHS should issue guidance clarifying that mental health and substance use clinicians and professionals are included in priority testing for COVID-19as well as targets of emergency medical supplies including masks, respirators, ventilators, and other needed resources for health care professionals during this crisis.
  • CMS should issue guidance for various care contingencies should substance use treatment providers become sick or unable to work and affect required quotas for reimbursement.
  • SAMHSA should issue guidance to support remote recovery support groups.
  • Congress should pass S. 2244/H.R. 4131, the Improving Access to Remote Behavioral Health Treatment Act, to clarify the eligibility of community mental health and addiction treatment centers to prescribe controlled substances for opioid use disorder via telemedicine. HHS recently waived the Ryan Haight restrictions for this pandemic, but this ends once the national emergency ends which could create treatment gaps.
  • HHS should launch a special enrollment period for commercial health insurance in the healthcare.gov marketplace during this crisis and future public health crises.
  •  Congress should ensure that all government health plans provide extended supplies and/or mail order refills of prescriptions.
  •  Congress should allow for all current discretionary and block grant funds for mental health and substance use programs, including prevention, intervention, treatment, and recovery support, across all relevant agencies across the federal government that cannot be spent this fiscal year due to the pandemic to be automatically extended into Fiscal Year 2021.

Pass, implement, and/or appropriate funding to strengthen crisis services and surveillance including:

  •  S. 2661/H.R. 4194, the National Suicide Hotline Designation Act, which would formally designate a three-digit number for the Lifeline.
  • H.R. 4564, The Suicide Prevention Lifeline Improvement Act, which would implement a set of quality metrics to ensure resources are effective and evidence-based.
  • H.R. 4585, the Campaign to Prevent Suicide Act, which establishes an educational campaign to advertise the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline and suicide prevention resources.
  • H.R. 1329, Medicaid Reentry Act, which would allow Medicaid-eligible incarcerated individuals to restart their benefits 30 days pre-release.
  • Increase funding for the Disaster Distress Helpline.
  • Increase funding to serve people who are homeless and to divert people who are at immediate risk of becoming homeless during this crisis.

Pass and implement reforms to ensure long-term availability of care, especially for populations at higher risk of self-harm or substance misuse, including:

  • S. 824/H.R. 1767, the Excellence in Mental Health and Addiction Treatment Expansion Act, which would expand the Certified Community Behavioral Health Clinic Program.
  • S. 1122/H.R. 1109, the Mental Health Services for Students Act which expands SAMHSA’s Project AWARE State Educational Agency Grant Program to support the provision of mental health services.
  • S. 2492/H.R. 2599, the Suicide Training and Awareness Nationally Delivered for Universal Prevention (STANDUP) Act, which would create and implement suicide prevention training policies in states, tribes, and school districts.
  • Enforce mental health parity and pass S. 1737/H.R. 3165, the Mental Health Parity Compliance Act and S. 1576/H.R. 2874, the Behavioral Health Transparency Act.
  • Expand HRSA’s NHSC Substance Use Disorder Workforce Loan Repayment Program H.R. 2431, the Mental Health Professionals Workforce Shortage Loan Repayment Act, which would establish a loan repayment program for mental health professionals working in shortage areas.
  • S. 2772/H.R. 884, the Medicare Mental Health Access Act, which would allow expanding the definition of “physician” under Medicare, allowing psychologists to practice to the full extent of their state licensure without physician oversight of Medicare facilities.

HHS should consider the mental health and substance use effects of future pandemics and national emergencies including:

  • Establishing an interagency taskforce or advisory committee on disaster mental health and substance use to ensure future responses take proper measures to coordinate care, allocate resources, and take appropriate measures to ensure recovery.
  • Convening a working group to review current research and funding on disaster mental health through NIH, AHRQ, CDC, SAMHSA, HRSA, FDA, and the Department of Justice, and other relevant agencies and identify gaps in knowledge, areas of recent progress, and necessary priorities.

Signing on to the letter were:

2020 Mom, AAMFT Research & Education Foundation, Active Minds, Addiction Connections Resource, Advocates for Opioid Recovery, African American Health Alliance, American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry, American Art Therapy Association, American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, American Association for Psychoanalysis in Clinical Social Work, American Association of Suicidology, American Counseling Association, American Dance Therapy Association American Foundation for Suicide Prevention American Group Psychotherapy Association, American Mental Health Counselors Association, American Psychological Association, American Public Health Association, Anxiety and Depression Association of America, California Pan-Ethnic Health Network Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP)Centerstone, Children and Adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Clean Slate Medical Group -Addiction Treatment, Clinical Social Work Association, Coalition to End Social

Isolation & Loneliness, College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists (CPNP )Colorado Children’s Campaign Columbia Psychiatry, Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America (CADCA, )Community Care Alliance Davis Direction Foundation, Depression and Bipolar Support Alliance, Easterseals, Eating Disorders Coalition, Families USA, Flawless Foundation, Foundation for Recovery, Global Alliance for Behavioral Health and Social Justice, Greater Philadelphia Business Coalition on Health, Health Resources in Action, Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, InnovaTel, Telepsychiatry International, OCD Foundation,

Mental Health America, NAADAC, the Association for Addiction Professionals, National Association of County Behavioral Health and Developmental Disability Directors, National Association for Rural Mental Health (NARMH), National Alliance on Mental Illness, National Association for Children of Addiction (NACoA, )National Association of Community Health Workers, National Association of Counties, National Association of Social Workers, National Association of Social Workers -Texas Chapter, National Association of Social Workers at the University of Southern California, National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors, National Council for Behavioral Health, National Eating Disorders Association, National Federation of Families for Children’s Mental Health, National Organization on Fetal Alcohol Syndrome, National Register of Health Service Psychologists, Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies, Neurofeedback Advocacy Project, New Jersey Association of Mental Health and Addiction Agencies, Inc., O’Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Postpartum Support International, Prevention Institute, Public Health Foundation, Residential Eating Disorders Consortium, Robert Graham Center, San Francisco AIDS Foundation, San Juan County Behavioral Health Department, Sandy Hook Promise SMART Recovery, Staten Island Partnership for Community Wellness, Suicide Awareness Voices of Education, Texans Care for Children, The Confederation of Independent Psychoanalytic Societies (CIPS), The Gerontological Society of America, The Institute for Innovation & Implementation at UMBSSW, The Jed Foundation, The National Alliance to Advance Adolescent Health, The Trevor Project, The Voices Project, Trust for America’s Health, United States of Care, University of Southern California, Well Being Trust.

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. Twitter: @HealthyAmerica1

55 Organizations Call for Passage and Fast Implementation of Paid Sick Leave for all Workers as a Critical Part of COVID-19 Response

(Washington, DC) – A cross-sector group of 55 public health, health, labor, business and social policy organizations are jointly calling on the Trump Administration and Congress to pass and quickly implement a federal paid sick leave law that provides 14 days of such leave to all workers, available immediately upon declaration of a public health emergency. Fourteen days aligns with the currently recommended quarantine period for COVID-19. Furthermore, and beyond the COVID-19 response, the coalition recommends that the new law require all employers, regardless of their size, to allow workers to earn up to seven days of paid sick leave for use when they or a family member is ill or for preventative care.

The group is also proposing tax relief or interest free loans to be made available for small businesses that provide sick leave benefits during a public health emergency and that employees be allowed to take leave if schools or places of employment close due to a public health emergency. Furthermore, employees should be allowed to use leave to care for family members and should be protected from job loss or any other forms of reprisal if they comply with public health or medical advice to stay home.

Multiple health studies have found that the absence of paid sick leave has been linked to or has exacerbated infectious disease outbreaks in the past. In dealing with the current novel coronavirus, the experience of other countries indicates that aggressive social distancing measures can help slow the spread of the virus. Yet for the 34 million individuals who do not have access to paid sick leave, staying at home may not be a realistic option. Many individuals without paid sick time earn low wages, and a disproportionate percentage work in the service industry. Just 30 percent of low-wage workers in the private sector have access to paid sick leave, compared to 93 percent of higher-wage workers.

“Everyone has a role to play in managing the COVID-19 outbreak. Immediate passage and fast implementation of a national paid sick leave law will allow all workers to follow the directions of their communities’ public health officials. It is critical to mitigation efforts that people be able to stay home from work if they are sick or if they may have been exposed to the virus without facing the impossible choice of their health or their financial stability,” said John Auerbach, President and CEO of Trust for America’s Health.

A letter outlining the recommended policy actions was delivered today to Vice President Mike Pence, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, (R-KY), Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, (D-NY), House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, (D-CA), and House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-CA).

Organizations signing-on to the letter were:

American Lung Association
American Medical Student Association
American Public Health Association
American School Health Association
American Sexual Health Association
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Antibiotic Resistance Action Center, George Washington University
Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum
Association for Prevention Teaching and Research
Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology
Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs
Association of Public Health Laboratories
Association of Schools and Programs of Public Health
Center for Global Health Science and Security Georgetown University
Center for Public Policy Priorities
Center for Science in the Public Interest
Children’s Environmental Health Network
Clean Habitat Inc
Colorado Association of Local Public Health Officials
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists
de Beaumont Foundation
Florida Institute for Health Innovation
Georgetown University Center for Global Health Science and Security
Green & Healthy Homes Initiative
Health Resources in Action
HIV Medicine Association
Immunize Nevada
Infectious Diseases Society of America
Liver Health Initiative
March of Dimes
National Association of County and City Health Officials
National Association of School Nurses
National Coalition of STD Directors
National Council of Jewish Women
National Fragile X Foundation
National Health Care for the Homeless Council
National Network of Public Health Institutes
National Organization for Women
NERDS RULE INC
NW Unangax Culture
NYU School of Global Public Health
PATH
Peggy Lillis Foundation
People’s Action
Prevention Institute
Public Health Institute
Public Health Solutions
Rollins School of Public Health
Safe States Alliance
Shriver Center on Poverty Law
Society for Public Health Education
Sumner M Redstone Global Center for Prevention and Wellness
Trust for America’s Health
Washington State Department of Health
Washington State Public Health Association
Women’s Law Project

# # #

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority.  Twitter: @healthyamerica1

TFAH’s Dr. J. Nadine Gracia’s Testimony before House Committee on Homeland Security, Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. COVID-19 Response

Dr. J. Nadine Gracia, Executive Vice President and Chief Operations Officer of Trust for America’s Health (TFAH), provided testimony during the Community Perspective on Coronavirus Preparedness and Response before the Subcommittee on Emergency Preparedness, Response, and Recovery of the House Committee on Homeland Security. Dr. Gracia’s testimony highlights TFAH’s policy recommendations to strengthen our nation’s preparedness for public health emergencies and improve the national response to the novel coronavirus.

TFAH Applauds Passage of Supplemental Funding for COVID-19 Response: Now Funding Must Move Quickly to States and Other Entities

(Washington, DC – March 5, 2020) – Trust for America’s Health, a nonprofit, nonpartisan public health policy organization, applauds Congress’ fast action in approving the Coronavirus Preparedness and Response Supplemental Appropriations Act (H.R 6074). We now call on the tasked federal agencies to move quickly to send the appropriated monies to the agencies and localities working at the frontlines of the COVID-19 crisis.

Emergency funding is critical now for the following:

  • Domestic public health. The supplemental provides essential support to states and local public health departments. This will provide support for their work which includes identifying and investigating cases, isolating and quarantining individuals, screening travelers at airports, ensuring the laboratory capacity to test patients for the virus, coordinating with the health sector to guarantee needed services are available, assessing the needs of those who are most vulnerable because of social, economic or environmental conditions and communicating with the public and healthcare facilities. The breadth of the response is quickly exhausting the funding provided in annual appropriations bills.
  • Healthcare response.  The supplemental provides support to hospitals, health centers and other clinical facilities across the nation have begun to identify, isolate and care for patients with COVID-19.  Among the work of the health care system is training healthcare workers on the identification of COVID-19 cases and on appropriate infection control practices and treatment.  The supplemental includes funding for training, provision of healthcare at community health centers, who serve the most vulnerable Americans, and ensuring the health care sector has appropriate personal protective equipment, necessary clinical supplies and equipment, and surge capacity.
  • Medical countermeasures research and development. The supplemental ensures the U.S. prioritizes development and procurement of COVID-19 diagnostics, vaccines, and treatments. The federal government must be a reliable partner in development of products to combat the virus.
  • Global health security. The supplemental supports global efforts through the World Health Organization, USAID and other agencies to boost the capacity of lower-income countries to detect and control infectious disease outbreaks.  This will protect Americans as well as other countries by decreasing the likelihood of transmission as a result of travel and commerce.
  • Investing in standing reserve funds. The supplemental fully replaces funds spent from the Infectious Disease Rapid Response Reserve Fund and adds money in this fund, so new funding can be immediately accessed if needed to fight COVID-19 and as an investment in protecting Americans from future outbreaks.
  • Replacing funds lost due to transfers. The supplemental includes a requirement to pay back the $136 million transferred between HHS program for the initial COVID-19 response.

The full extent of the outbreak in terms of public health, healthcare and personal costs remains to be seen, but this investment is needed now.  Taking immediate steps to mitigate the effects of the outbreak will save lives and prevent harm.

Trust for America’s Health is a nonprofit, nonpartisan public health policy, research and advocacy organization that promotes optimal health for every person and community and makes the prevention of illness and injury a national priority. 

 

TFAH Statement on COVID-19 Preparations

March 3, 2020

Now that the U.S. has transitioned from the planning phase to the response phase of the COVID-19 outbreak, the Federal Executive Branch and Congress as well as state and local governments and other stakeholders should prioritize the following:


Emergency funding is critical now, with ongoing funding to prevent future emergencies

Congress should quickly approve a supplemental funding package, with significant investments in domestic and global public health, healthcare preparedness and research and development of medical countermeasures. Federal agencies should be preparing to quickly distribute funds to states and local governments, as any delay could cost lives.

Congress and the administration should not rely on transfers between health programs to solve this problem.  TFAH recommends that Congress use the supplemental funding package currently being considered to back-fill programs that have already been cut to transfer funding for the COVID-19 outbreak response. Reprogramming money from other public health initiatives, such as chronic disease prevention, won’t serve the public’s health in the long run.

The emergency supplemental funding should include the following priorities:

  • Domestic public health. States and local jurisdictions have stood up their emergency operations, identifying and investigating cases, isolating and quarantining individuals, screening travelers at airports, ensuring the laboratory capacity to test patients for the virus, coordinating with the health sector to guarantee needed services are available, assessing the needs of those who are most vulnerable because of social, economic or environmental conditions and communicating with the public and healthcare facilities. Attention needs to be paid to those people who seem to be most at risk for serious health complications due to COVID-19 including the elderly and people with underlying health conditions. The breadth of the response is quickly exhausting the funding provided in annual appropriations bills.
  • Healthcare response. Hospitals, health centers and other clinical facilities across the nation are preparing to identify, isolate and care for patients with COVID-19.    They must do so without interrupting the routine and necessary clinical services for those with other healthcare needs.  This will require training for healthcare workers on the identification of COVID-19 cases, and on appropriate infection control practices and treatment.  The health care sector needs resources for some of these activities and to ensure it has appropriate personal protective equipment, necessary clinical supplies and equipment, and surge capacity.
  • Medical countermeasures research and development. The U.S. government should prioritize development and procurement of COVID-19 diagnostics, vaccines, and treatments. This will require special measures to anticipate and plan to meet future need and to determine how to make appropriate services available to all with special attention to those in underserved communities.
  • Global health security. The U.S. must support global efforts through the World Health Organization, USAID and other agencies to boost the capacity of lower-income countries to detect and control infectious disease outbreaks.  This will protect Americans as well as other countries by decreasing the likelihood of transmission as a result of travel and commerce.
  • Invest in standing reserve funds. The supplemental should fully replace funds spent from the Infectious Disease Rapid Response Reserve Fund and add a significant amount of money in this fund, so new funding can be immediately accessed if needed to fight COVID-19 and as an investment in protecting Americans from future outbreaks.

The full cost of the outbreak will become clear in the next few months, but in the short term, a significant investment is needed now. Ongoing monitoring of the course of the outbreak will determine the total amount of additional funding that may be required.


Ensure that core public health is continually funded 

In addition to short-term supplemental funding, Congress must prioritize ongoing investment in public health as part of the annual appropriations process.  The nation’s ability to respond to COVID-19 is rooted in our level of public health investment of the last decade.  That is, being prepared starts well before the health emergency is upon us and is grounded in year-in and year-out investment in public health programs. In addition, our public health system needs a highly skilled workforce, state-of-the-art data and information systems and the policies, and plans and resources necessary to meet the routine and unexpected threats to the health and well-being of the American public.  The nation has been caught in a cycle of attention when an outbreak or emergency occurs, followed by complacency and disinvestment in public health preparedness, infrastructure and workforce between emergencies.  These are systems that cannot be established overnight, once an outbreak is underway.

Science is key to effective response

Science needs to govern the nation’s COVID-19 response, led by federal public health experts – including the CDC and NIH leadership – who have years of experience in responding to infectious disease outbreaks.  Keeping the public fully informed is critically important, if trust is to be retained. Policy decisions – from the federal to the local level – should also be based on the best available science.

Local governments and other sectors must prepare now for various contingencies.

  • Healthcare facilities must plan for a surge of patients. Such planning should include taking steps to ensure continuity of operations if a sizable number of their workforce is sick.  They must prioritize the safety of patients and workers, by using personal protective equipment and by providing adequate training. Healthcare coalitions – in coordination with governmental entities – should offer situational awareness and coordination between facilities.
  • Employers, including those in the healthcare sector, should adopt paid sick days protections for workers to protect the health and safety of other workers and the general public. In addition, they should assure their employees that missing work due to illness will not jeopardize their job.
  • Communities that are considering school or business closures or similar measures should consider unintended consequences and take appropriate action steps. If closings are necessary authorities should assist families for whom such action is especially problematic, such as low- income families and individuals without paid sick leave, and children who rely on school meals for adequate nutrition.  Homebound individuals who need access to health care personnel, equipment and medications may also need additional assistance.

The full extent of the outbreak in terms of public health, healthcare and personal costs remains to be seen.  We do know that taking immediate steps to mitigate the effects of the outbreak will save lives and prevent harm.